So I have spent a small fortune on two rear facing isofix car seats that were advertised as being suitable up to the ages of 2 and then 4. However it turns out that my child is massive for his age so at 2.5 he's already outgrowing the weight guidance on the replacement one I bought that was meant to last him until he was roughly 4. He's not unhealthy just to clarify, he's very tall and sturdy for his age so he's just proportionally massive!
I've been reading loads recently about how rear facing car seats are so much better for safety and outcomes in an accident but I'm struggling to find one that goes past 4 that isn't really expensive given that I've already spent a lot on car seats and bases that haven't suited long term. My car also is quite small so I don't want to invest in another full system that means my front passenger seat is very restricted, but at the same time it means I want something decent that will protect him if we were in a crash.
What I'm curious about is why the outcomes with rear facing are better - is it due to the structure of the seat or the size of the child ie. if ds is the size of a 4 yo then is forward facing going to be OK for him even though he's still only 2.5? Or is this a data collection issue and it's only been tested on younger ages of children so there simply isn't the data available for rear v forward facing crash outcomes for older sized kids?
Obviously I want him to be safe and if I thought it was worth the money and there was information to back it up, I don't mind buying a pricier seat but I am not in a position where I want to waste money either.
Does anyone have any clear information on this as what I've read seems quite vague?