So I know this is going to be a controversial topic with an avalanche of triggered replies, so please read carefully to avoid flying off the handle without reading properly!
Before I had kids I assumed that hitting was the ultimate bad thing against a child and everything else (that's legal) that a parent could do would be less bad. I'm not talking about escalating to broken bones or other things, I'm meaning the traditional smacking/slipper/belt or whatever they favoured in times gone by. I'm calling it hitting because that's basically what it is.
But since being a parent I can't really work out why hitting is such a taboo, when there are so many other things that are acceptable but surely do more damage to the children long term?
For example demeaning/shaming your child, controlling them by rejecting them based on whether you approve of their behaviour or not (aka ignore the behaviour you don't like, praise the behaviour you do like), etc etc.
So my question is, is hitting worse or is the associated rejection worse, even if imposed without hitting?