I've always dealt with DS (18) with a stricter attitude than with DD (15, going on 16). It looks like favouritism on my part with regard to DD; I am very lenient with her. She goes to parties and I tell her to have fun. We have girly chats about boys, clothes, parties, make-up, and sports. With DS, I am harsher. The truth is that I'm more protective of him. DH has sat down with me, telling me I have to 'let him breathe'. I know this, its just damn hard.
DH and I had DS a little earlier than we had expected to have children. We were unprepared emotionally and financially. We had DD after getting our first mortgage, DH had got a promotion. We were in a better place. The gap between my two DCs isn't large, but it's become a habit of mine to micromanage DS. I always find out who he's hanging out with, suspicious that he might get up to 'no good' . This comes from the fact that I had him while me and DH lived in an inner city area, we were young professionals. We didn't even have a car yet. Until recently, I would advise DH give DS a lift from parties in case he can't catch a taxi/his friends abandoned him. DD, on the other hand, has free rein.
DS has been applying for university. I was horrified when he wanted to settle on Queen Mary ( Mile End), totally relieved when he got an offer from York. I was and am stricter with him come exam time. He went out with mates and I lost my temper with him that he didn't have his priorities straight. A shouting match ensued. As for DD - everything fine, allowed to do whatever the fuck she wants (within reason).
Does anyone else have any experience with unreasonably treating each teenager differently? I know I'm in the wrong here and it is almost time for DS to explore the world alone. He's off to uni in September. I just have so much trouble getting past attitudes formed when Dcs were infants!