We did intentionally parent towards what you describe and studied and agreed on this before we had DC.
I initially (pre-children) leaned more towards attachment parenting but then my first born was a child who thrived with external structure and needs lots of guidance. So we moved more towards focusing on secure attachment, recognising and being responsive to developmental stages, emotional regulation support, critical thinking, and social communication skills.
I agree with pp who said that this kind of parenting work requires emotional intelligence- I certainly had/have to work harder than DH at parenting. DH is more skilled at his own emotional regulation than I am and he is less impulsive/reactive than I am. But I am more spontaneous/fun and more able to emotionally co-regulate.
Our DC are now late teens and we have very strong relationships, sometimes I am surprised at how much they trust us for advice and support.
They are, however, very different children - one needing external structure and the other highly self-motivated. They didn't go through a big rebellious stage or drugs, etc.
They are responsible, respectful and socially aware but certainly not perfect. One still requires a lot of outside structure or can quickly lose focus but that DC is aware of this.
I don't know though, they are both very much their own selves. Who is to say that we had such a huge impact on them? It feels more like we provided a particular environment and they grew into their own personalities rather than we influenced them so greatly to be who they are.
Although with the increasing knowledge of ACEs (Adverse Childhood Experiences) and the developmental impact on children, at least, as parents, we tried to prevent trauma as much as our influence allowed us.