hello, dd was born with dark hair that went progressively redder and is now a very vibrant shade. I think it's gorgeous, especially since I have mousey blah coloured hair. However there's no redheads on either side and I'm wondering whether it's safe to say it's going to stay or whether it's a phase baby's hair goes through a bit like eye colour (they're still a bit of unknown quantity too). It's quite thick and has already had to be cut a couple of times.
Hmmm, aren't genes grand?
Pol
ps it's been an interesting introduction into the world of anti-ginger prejudice though - people are always calling it "titian", "auburn" and "well at least it's not ginger". Oh and a lot of "it's alright for a girl". Why is ok to dye your hair red but not to have it naturally?