Best Amazon Prime Day deals: Mumsnet favourites

Best Amazon Prime Day deals:
Mumsnet favourites

Shop now

Please or to access all these features

Parenting

For free parenting resources please check out the Early Years Alliance's Family Corner.

Did you find it harder going from 1-2 or 2-3?

28 replies

incontrolofmyownlife · 27/09/2019 16:27

As the title asks, did you find it harder going from 1-2? Or 2-3?

Haven't quite decided whether to go for it yet... Grin

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
4cheekymonkey · 27/09/2019 18:52

Found 2-3 definitely harder as had 3 at home so was just outnumbered. Good luck whatever you decide

MidnightMystery · 27/09/2019 20:28

2-3 was harder but on the flip side it is worth it!

WhiskersPete · 27/09/2019 20:30

Watching with interest

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

incontrolofmyownlife · 27/09/2019 21:13

I was expecting (hoping?!) people to say 1-2 was harder...

Interesting.

OP posts:
KaliforniaDreamz · 29/09/2019 17:37

2-3

just much more work to do

but lovely at times!!

PhannyMcNee · 29/09/2019 17:38

1-2.

2-3 was a dream, no 3 just slotted into our lives without any fuss. Lulled us into such a sense of security and thinking that we'd nailed it that we went onto have no4. We hadn't nailed it.

randomusername · 29/09/2019 17:43

2-3, more children than hands 🙈

incontrolofmyownlife · 29/09/2019 19:46

Nooo don't all be saying 2-3! Grin how old were all your children if you don't mind me asking?

DC1 would be 8-9 if we did go for it and I'm wondering if that might make it easier...

OP posts:
Crystal87 · 29/09/2019 19:49

I didn't find one harder than the other. I expected my third to be tricky, but it wasn't, I just adapted my routine slightly. Goimg from 3 to 4 was hard though, but I think that was down to my youngest three being very young.

Muuuuuuuum · 29/09/2019 19:53

2-3 by a long way. Dc1 was easiest baby ever, dc2 slotted in. Think ages might have been big issue - DC 1&2 were 4 & 2 when dc3 arrived.

DramaAlpaca · 29/09/2019 19:55

1-2 because the age gap was so small, only 16 months. 2-3 was a doddle in comparison.

Maniak · 29/09/2019 19:56

2-3 because you can't sleep at night and you can't sleep in the day. You basically can't ever sleep. But you have to. I went insane. Only two years between each child though. And I'm fine now! Ha ha ha, I'm not fine now lmao.

escapade1234 · 29/09/2019 19:57

I found 1-2 a far bigger shock to the system. Emotionally I felt very wobbly for a while about the loss of our little unit of 3 and about not having the time I’d had previously for my PFB. By the time number three arrived I was used to that feeling and my second child has never known life without a sibling so one more didn’t seem such a change to the status quo.

escapade1234 · 29/09/2019 19:59

Your eldest being 8/9 will make it so much easier. Their needs are very different to toddlers and the ones I know who’ve had new babies at around that age have really loved it.

THNG5 · 29/09/2019 20:00

Definitely 1-2 for me. There's only 13 months between them so I literally had 2 babies on my hands! I now have 3 under 3 (a just turned 3 year old, a just turned 2 year old and a 4 month old) but as I knew what to expect and what would be difficult, I mentally prepared!

HarryPotterFan436 · 29/09/2019 20:03

2-3 has been ridiculously hard. Mine are 12, 3 and 1.

Contraceptionismyfriend · 29/09/2019 20:15

Honestly I found 0-1 the hardest.

1-2 was alright and 2-3 has been fine. The only thing I've noticed is a ridiculous increase in laundry.

Contraceptionismyfriend · 29/09/2019 20:15

Forgot to add they are 5, 3 and 0

bobstersmum · 29/09/2019 20:16

Definitely 2-3. I had my second baby when first was only 11 months old. It wasn't as hard as I expected as we were already in the thick of it baby wise. 3rd came along when the others were 3+4 and it was hard. Still is! Definitely not having any more.

Bigpaintinglittlepainting · 29/09/2019 20:20

0-1 the hardest, but that’s because 2 was an easy peasy baby and three was a nightmare Grin he is the glue that binds all of us together though.

He didn’t sleep for 3 years and I couldn’t work cause he was so clingy Shock but it’s lovely and I wouldn’t have it any other way as even at the height of sleep deprivation he was great company and a very easy going kid

OhMyGiddyAunty · 29/09/2019 21:31

0-1 was by far the hardest here.

1-2 was easier, 2-3 was easier still.

I'm not sure whether we became progressively better parents (Wink)or whether we were just sent calmer babies.

Obviously age gaps play a part as well, a ten year old and a baby is different to a baby and another baby...

BackforGood · 30/09/2019 00:19

0 - 1 was the hardest by a million miles.

In comparison 1 -2 was a piece of cake and 2 - 3 was a joy. Hardly noticeable.

I suspect some of this is to do with their personalities. A Lot has to do with being a more experienced parent and worrying FAR less about the small stuff.

BadTigerKitty · 30/09/2019 00:21

1-2 was awful. 2-3 no problem. It's totally down to the personalities of your children, though!

SherbetSaucer · 30/09/2019 00:31

A good rule of thumb is never let your children outnumber you!!

4cheekymonkey · 30/09/2019 13:57

Sherbet yes that is a good rule however it's easily done easily done these days.
OP yes if your first will be 8-9 that will definitely help. My ds1 was 9 when ds4 came along and he did help a lot and could trust him with things(well with limits)

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is closed and is no longer accepting replies. Click here to start a new thread.

Swipe left for the next trending thread