Just wondering. Have been sorting through job lots of baby toys to prepare for DC2 (large gap so nothing left from DC1.) I had only really culled about 15%, because the rest was usable, but DH insisted on saving about half of what I'd rejected on the premise that we should wait and see what the baby likes playing with, rather than make the decision ourselves.
I disagree and don't think that babies really have preferences, and actually do better with fewer higher quality/carefully selected toys rather than just an avalanche of random stuff.
My premise is that I wouldn't discard anything which had been chosen by somebody as a gift (unless it was totally offensive/dangerous), and I wouldn't discard anything that a child had an attachment to, but if it's not a gift, it's totally fine to pick and choose what you give them in the first place, before they have a chance to form any attachment to it. No? DH reckons it's useful to have spares and that I shouldn't be making judgements on the duplicate items, because that's the baby's choice to make.
I wouldn't chuck stuff or give it away behind DH's back either as I think that's mean but I do feel a bit narked at some of the stuff that he rescued from the discard pile! I don't mind that he rescued the weird dog with the vacant eyes which sings about all of its body parts, since he seems to actually like that - I do mind us keeping three pull along toys when two would be fine, a set of crap plastic rattles (there are other, nicer rattles) and the second singing octopus with the distorted voice.
(I appreciate I may be overthinking this. And thank god he agreed to chucking a few of the really ancient looking ones.)