Two EBF babies here and neither wanted anything to do with DH for the first year of their lives, and possibly even slightly beyond (both BF until 17mo). No way in hell could he 'settle' them because he simply didn't have the necessary equipment. It really upset DH with DS1 - he knew to expect it with DS2.
Fast forward four years and DS1 is having a Reception afternoon tea at school. One of his little friends says to him, 'Who do you like best? Your mummy or your daddy? I love mummy the best!' DS1 looked both horrified and affronted and said without pause, 'I love them both the same!' DH wasn't there so DS1 wasn't just being diplomatic. Suffice it to say, I told DH this as soon as he got home and asked him if he ever thought the mummy-clinging limpet would ever say that. He admitted he didn't, and he got slightly weepy, by gum. 
The way he 'bonded' was going swimming with them as PPs have suggested, doing bath time, he wore DS2 a lot in a sling, post-feed cuddles (never give a dad a hungry EBF baby, oh no, no, no...), passing a sleeping Velcro baby to dad so s/he doesn't wake up if you have the temerity to put them down in a cot. Feeding does NOT equal bonding. FWIW, the child above who said she loved mummy best was FF and fed by both parents equally, yet mummy is her preference at 4/5 years old. It's experiences and not feeding methods that bond children to parents.
Re: bottle refusing. I just got used to going out for max 2hrs with DS1 as he was a TOTAL bottle refuser. Even when he started nursery full time at 8mo, milk would not pass his gullet unless it was direct from the mummy-cow. DS2 got a daily bottle of EBM from about 3 weeks old, but even then I couldn't go out for long on account of exploding boobs. You get used to it, and in the scheme of things, it doesn't last long.