Are your children’s vaccines up to date?

Set a reminder

Please or to access all these features

Parenting

For free parenting resources please check out the Early Years Alliance's Family Corner.

Health visitor says no baby porridge at 16 old any opinions pls

143 replies

isobel79 · 29/06/2016 16:24

Hi

My HV has said no baby porridge for my lo who is 16 weeks tomorrow. He is on 7oz of milk. He weighed 15lb on 16\6.

Any opinions would be gratefully received. I feel like he needs something more. He's on pepti 1 and it doesn't seem to fill him up.

Thanks all
Smile

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
calamityjam · 29/06/2016 22:22

Actually it was 3 months until 1994, then changed to 4 months. I can still remember the food jars saying "From 3 months of age" on them.

calamityjam · 29/06/2016 22:24

There is current scientific proof which states that in order to have the best chance of avoiding food allergies, wean from 16 weeks.

user1467101855 · 29/06/2016 22:27

It's not "proof", its merely some studies which suggest certain things. There is no such thing as proof in these matters, or indeed in science in general.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

OhTheRoses · 29/06/2016 22:29

DS is a strapping 21 year old. At 12 weeks his,hunger was insatiable. 11oz bottles every three hours and he was turning into the Michelin baby. The GP suggested baby rice. He made a face. I tried an ice cube portion of pear puree. He wolfed it. He was on two jars a day within the week. He was very alert and dextrous.

Rainuntilseptember · 29/06/2016 22:29

My DM weaned me at 4 weeks, as I believe was the custom back then. Did she know best?

user1467101855 · 29/06/2016 22:31

That was never the custom. 4 weeks is mental.

calamityjam · 29/06/2016 22:31

"proof" being a term used when there is actual scientific evidence to back up a statement. Unlike some terms such as "Closed gut" which are being thrown around to scare parents, with no such evidence base.

bruffin · 29/06/2016 22:32

Ds was 1995 and he was weaned at 12 weeks. Dd is 18 and her red book say 4 months.

WellErrr · 29/06/2016 22:32

Of course there is evidence of the closed gut. Don't be absurd.

user1467101855 · 29/06/2016 22:33

It's not a term used at all. If you actually read the newer studies about early weaning and allergies (as I have) they use the standard terminology such as "this suggests" and "it could be extrapolated" and so on.
No proof either way.

CocktailQueen · 29/06/2016 22:37

Vri - my dd is 12. 12 years ago the advice was to wean at 6 months - not 3/4!

Rainuntilseptember · 29/06/2016 22:39

How can you possibly know that User, without knowing the year/place involved?
I'm not talking about steak and chips, but the melting of rusks into a bottle.

DramaAlpaca · 29/06/2016 22:42

calamityjam our DC must be around the same age because I remember exactly the same as you.

When DC1 was born in 1993 it was 12 weeks, by the time DC2 arrived in early 1995 it had changed to 16 weeks.

All mine were weaned at the age recommended at the time, and all are healthy.

calamityjam · 29/06/2016 22:42

Believe me, I read the evidence and the latest findings on scientific research surrounding baby weaning. To put it basic terms; "Do you have proof of that"
"Yes, here is substantial evidence to suggest that..."
It is a lay term. The semantics don't concern me, it's the sudo-scientific bollocks that people band about tring to scare parents.
WellErr, show me any evidence to suggest that a child of 6 months has a closed gut.

user1467101855 · 29/06/2016 22:45

A scientist would never say YES to the question "Do you have proof", especially on a question like this..
Its not a lay term its an accurate one.
(its pseudo-scientific btw)

user1467101855 · 29/06/2016 22:45

an inaccurate one. dyac!

BeenThereTooSEL · 29/06/2016 22:46

We started at 20 weeks. I posted something similar on another site and got some hellish backlash! I felt she needed something more. But we did puréed fruit she never liked baby rice/porridge

BeenThereTooSEL · 29/06/2016 22:49

Also if he's on pepti 1 he should be under a dietician. My BF had a LO on similar and was told to introduce at 19 weeks but he had dropped to the 9th centile. Maybe ask to see a dietician?

calamityjam · 29/06/2016 22:49

If in doubt, correct someone's spelling. My dsyslexia nevr hld me bak b4.

calamityjam · 29/06/2016 22:50

And yes, before anyone points it out, I am indeed dyslexic.

user1467101855 · 29/06/2016 22:50

I was trying to be helpful, but ok.

calamityjam · 29/06/2016 22:52

Helpful? It is ok for someone to pull someone up about spelling because you are helpful. This is an internet forum. I got more leeway with my degree.

BeenThereTooSEL · 29/06/2016 22:52

Also one HV said we were OK to start purée when she could hold her head independently? She was sitting up at 5 months?

But in my experience HVs all say different things as their training isn't uniformed ( or at least where we live)

user1467101855 · 29/06/2016 22:54

I thought you might like to know the correct spelling so you could use it confidently in the future. Surprised if your tutors didn't do the same?

calamityjam · 29/06/2016 22:56

No you didn't, you thought it was a smart arsed thing to do, so you could giggle behind your keyboard. DFOD.

Swipe left for the next trending thread