Our little one is 3 months old now. I have friend coming to England to visit me. I would like to show her around a bit in Centre London. Plus I am a bit fed up myself after having stayed only in my area for the last three months.
Previously, I agreed with my hubby that our baby is quite small to travel to central London especially in winter when the virus are potentially everywhere. But I was thinking 3 months is sort of "milestone" which should provide more security in terms of health and the handling of the baby. Also I really couldn't figure out how "dangerous" it could be for traveling to central London by tube, provided we avoid rush hour and do a good planning about the accessibility of platforms in the tube stations.
But my hubby was really upset by my point of view last night. He's saying that he himself wouldn't be confident to handle it taking into account the crowd in London, the difficulty to find a place to change the nappy, the germs around and the transport. He even said that what if you fall on the platform...
I understand he's just being prudent. But isn't this a bit too much? I asked him "So in your opinion, people living in central London as long as they have a baby, they wouldn't go out at all?" Then he said "But they don't live in Barnet." But so what? I mean, the distance is really about sitting inside the tube and wait time to pass by. How more dangerous could that be??
Am I being unreasonable? Is it really not very wise to go to central London and visit the museums and etc. when the baby is still young???