I could use some Mumsnetter wisdom here!
So... DD is 2, sings Jolly Phonics songs about ants on her arm and clicking castanets at nursery and was apparently very quick to pick it up.
At home, we've had magnetic letters for DH and I for ages, which DD developed an interest in a while back and which, prior to Jolly Phonics, I showed her as a 'this is an A, and your cousin Adam's name begins with A.' She seemed interested at the time, I had no idea what, if any, was going in but if it kept her happy I would go with it.
Soon enough she could recite the alphabet as I learned it - ay, bee, cee, dee, ee, eff, gee - and can pick up a letter and say 'A is for Adam' or whatever. (The results are haphazard but she seems to get the idea with letters and names she knows well)
There was an amusing argument (lots of 'a's in that one) between DD and her older cousin on whether the alphabet should be 'read' as 'ay, bee, cee' or 'ah, buh, cuh', which I thought was hilarious but which worried my SIL. Now my SIL informs me I have irrevocably damaged my DD's chances by teaching her the 'wrong' way of learning the alphabet, and worse, that she can spell her name 'wrongly' but not phonetically.
Have I? Do I need to stop the cute 'A is for Adam and D is for Daddy' and say 'no darling, AH is for Adam and DUH is for Daddy - we don't say 'ay bee cee' any more'?
? They're not worried at nursery, for what it's worth.