Yes, with an age difference of 19 months and a difficult second pregnancy. We didn't have a TV before they were born, never really been too bothered, got one when youngest was 3, DH and I hardly watch it.
But I cheated - I returned to work when DD was 6 months old and she stayed with DH's aunt, who we paid to look after her. Gave up work after DS was born, but PIL looked after DD two days a week, and MIL used to also cook lots for us (not that I wanted her too, she just did!), so I had lots of support, and aunt looked after them again when I started working again.
Also, we were not in the UK, but in a country with a great climate 10 months of the year, so I spent hours sitting on park benches with DS in a sling watching DD play.
I think I would have found it difficult without TV in the UK if I had been a SHAM without any family support - the days can seem long and it can be so exhausting. I doubt it would have made much difference if I had let them watch TV when they were little.
We now live in the UK, and DC have pretty much unlimited access to the TV (only limited by having to go to activities or doing homework, or family things). They rarely watch during the week, but love watching films on Sunday mornings (which suits us fine, as it gives us a lie-in).