My ds got involved in a incident at school on Friday, which involved him and two other boys (yr 4) and a girl (yr 3) , this is how he has told it to me, they were saying that she loved another boy in the playground, said it a few a few times as they were walking towards her, she fell over and stung herself on some stinging nettles (not sure what they were doing in the playground). Now he got a 30 minute detention and a behaviour letter home for me to sign.
We are not the kind of parents to take this lightly, my dh was bullied at school and made it clear that this was way out of line, banned him from the tv and computer and made it clear if it happened again there would be bigger consequences and lots of them!
Heres my issue, the wording on the letter reads 'intimidating behaviour towards a younger child' which I felt was a bit strong.
Went into school this am to speak to his teacher who said the incident the same as ds, I told her what we had done at home, and confirmed that we had no issue with the detention, the head was hovering and I asked if the wording went on SIMs, he jumps in says feels it is in context and that intimidating is the right choice of word, but no the wording in the detention book goes on SIMs, so I asked to see that to which he is a little surprised. This says 'threatening behaviour' but fully describes the incident so does put it more into context. I suggested the form to parents should mirror the book if thats what is put on record.
He then said that my son whilst he can be caring and kind, can be intimidating and is a bit of a leader. This has never been mentioned to me, I had parents evening last week with just glowing reports, so was a little confused. I asked him for an example and he said that the playground assistant had told him, so I suggested that he spend some time with him and get to know him and will then see for himself.
Now this is not a perfect way to start a week, I was a little defensive which is not ideal, but to be fair so was he. Now I want to go back and tell him I'm not happy with 'threatening' either. Am I getting this out of proportion???
Thoughts please.