Are your children’s vaccines up to date?

Set a reminder

Please or to access all these features

Parenting

For free parenting resources please check out the Early Years Alliance's Family Corner.

Why "spoiled" babies grow up to be smarter/kinder/ kids

16 replies

KaraStarbuckThrace · 02/02/2011 18:21

here

Really good article, though am a bit Hmm at the use of the word spoiled.

Sad to think that some people think that you can spoil babies with too many cuddles Sad

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
baskingseals · 02/02/2011 21:20

thanks for that kara, very interesting and also reassuring

MrsBonkers · 03/02/2011 03:12

interesting other articles too. thanks.

mathanxiety · 03/02/2011 03:49

That use of 'spoiling' just shows how much society has lost its way when it comes to nurturing babies.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

mathanxiety · 03/02/2011 04:05

Though I don't think it's new ground -- Bowlby theory from wiki.

Simic · 03/02/2011 07:56

I just wish I'd seen all this stuff when I was pregnant for the first time...

Goblinchild · 03/02/2011 07:59

'All three studies suggested the same thing: children who are shown more affection early in life reap big benefits.
Researchers found that kids who were held more by their parents, whose cries received quick responses in infancy and who were disciplined without corporal punishment were more empathic'

On what planet does that count as spoiling a child? That's just loving them isn't it?

KaraStarbuckThrace · 03/02/2011 12:48

I know Goblin, but you see so many threads from people who have been told by relatives, to let tiny babies CIO, or that they are picking them up and cuddling too often Sad

OP posts:
foxytocin · 03/02/2011 12:54

spoiling is the wrong word, imo.

I think responsive is better.

Karoleann · 03/02/2011 16:26

Ummm that's not a research paper, its just some woman promoting her new book. There's no references for the three studies she mentions, they could have been done by anyone!
Of course little babies need love and affection, but other siblings and husbands (and you) deserve attention too and you can't do that if you're constantly holding a new baby.

Sassles · 03/02/2011 16:27

I reckon the title was picked for a response and to get people to read it. Doesn't mention spoiled anywhere in the article. It's a bit vague though. To what age should we be having our children constantly within arms reach?

YouCantTeuchThis · 03/02/2011 16:32

You are right Karoleann, there are no references for the studies, but she is not promoting her book. She is referenced in another book.

I agree that spoiling is the wrong term.

greedychops · 03/02/2011 16:32

Karoleann - you can if they are in a sling!

noddyholder · 03/02/2011 16:34

Going by this then ds should be a bloody saint

Lamorna · 03/02/2011 16:37

I don't think that showing affection is spoiling!

mathanxiety · 03/02/2011 22:04

Foxytocin, unfortunately, to some people responsiveness means spoiling.

Simic · 04/02/2011 07:46

All the mothers and mother-in-laws out there who tell new parents that they shouldn't pick the baby up straight away or they'll be spoiling it don't give references to research papers either. I think the more the idea that responsiveness is NOT WRONG gets into mainstream public thinking, the better!

New posts on this thread. Refresh page