Was just listening to Jeremy Vine on R2 (I was ironing for my holidays, OK?!) and they were talking about how sales of school trousers for girls, for the first time, have overtaken sales of school skirts. In 2002 only 2% of sales were for skirts, this year it's something like 56%. They had Edwina Currie on who was all for it - for the same reasons as I am (I must be getting old, agreeing with Edwina Currie). It's more practical - travelling to school in all weathers etc. She also said that short skirts in a classroom can be 'distracting' - having seen the shortness of some school skirts (I would worry for a daughter of mine dressed in some of those - they're indecent - now I know I'm old) I'd go along with that too.
I was wondering what reasons the opposition would come up with for school skirts and was gobsmacked when they dug up some woman (didn't catch her name) and the only reason she could come up with for preferring skirts over trousers was - get this - "most women do not have the derriere for trousers" and look "lumpy and ugly" in them. The increase in trouser wearing in British society apparently signifies a "reduction in the feminine role of women."
Well, excuse me - I thought our young woman were going to school to learn - not to look attractive in trousers or provide eye candy for the boys by wearing short skirts. Grrrrrr. First we are not to nork-feed in public lest it offend some dainty Daily Mail reader's sensibilities - now we are not to wear trousers because we will look "lumpy and ugly." Did feminism happen?
I wasn't allowed to wear a skirt at school and I can still remember having frozen knees at the bus stop in winter - we campaigned to be allowed to wear trousers but it didn't happen when I was there. Muslim girls wore trousers, but still had to wear a skirt over the top - not a good look, I have to say.
Thoughts?
(Don't tell me to go pack, I'm nearly done, honest).