Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Other subjects

MN Etiquette.

185 replies

Carmenere · 21/07/2008 11:29

I think that mn needs a bit of a guide to its specific local etiquette.

There are tons on unspoken 'rules' on here that you don't know if you don't live on spend lots of time on here.

Swearing in thread titles offends some, not me as it happens, but I do know it offends others so I don't do it.

Text speak is obviously a no no.

Ghoulish thread titles in the news section are ill advised.

Writing without paragraphs is another one that causes confusion and upset.

Basically it can be a bit of a minefield for a new poster. I don't think that it deserves a whole topic but maybe folks could add to this thread and it might be a good place to direct newbies to.

OP posts:
Slubberdegullion · 22/07/2008 11:41

ahhh now MrsB this is something I need clearing up.

I thought [ ] were for emoticons that do'nt exist

[slightly fed up]

< > were for doing

and

these were for thinking

I will await your reply. You tend to know about these things.

Slubberdegullion · 22/07/2008 11:42

aarrrrrrrgggggggggggghhhhhhhh

don't

buggery buggery buggery

MrsBadger · 22/07/2008 11:49

I think they are interchangeable

after all you type 'smile', 'grin', 'wink' in square brackets - why not 'frets' or 'scratches' or 'potters off down the garden' or 'contemplates bee crisis'?
The fact that some actions end up translated into pictures isn't really relevant IMO.

And to use double pointy brackets for thoughts would mean typing which looks odd. Contemplating is just another action...

Slubberdegullion · 22/07/2008 12:13

OK. So we have relaxed rules on bracket usage.

littlelapin · 22/07/2008 12:16

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Slubberdegullion · 22/07/2008 12:17

[waves back at lapin]

BoysAreLikeDogs · 22/07/2008 12:18

[considers whether to turn off monitor and go play with DCs]

BoysAreLikeDogs · 22/07/2008 12:19

[secret pash]

Slubberdegullion · 22/07/2008 12:20

are these { } only for

{{{{{hugs}}}}} though?

They do look a bit like arms.

littlelapin · 22/07/2008 12:20

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Slubberdegullion · 22/07/2008 12:21

Ironic {{{{{hugs}}}}} only obviously.

Slubberdegullion · 22/07/2008 12:22

And this little git ~ here. What is he for then?

BoysAreLikeDogs · 22/07/2008 12:22
BoysAreLikeDogs · 22/07/2008 12:23

[git envy]

I ain't got one of them

MrsBadger · 22/07/2008 12:24

now originally the convention was {{{Slubber}}} to indicate the poster was enclosed in soft curvy arms ie being hugged [vom]

I can do §§§ too, which I think is a belly dancing spider

Slubberdegullion · 22/07/2008 12:24

~pike with double inverted twist~

Diving techniques?

littlelapin · 22/07/2008 12:25

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Slubberdegullion · 22/07/2008 12:25

oooh look at that. MrsB has a belly dancing spider doohickey

BoysAreLikeDogs · 22/07/2008 12:25

Ooooh look , I found one ~

Slubberdegullion · 22/07/2008 12:27

Right, so I have read that post from lapin like 4 times now and the tilde is still a mystery to me.

littlelapin · 22/07/2008 12:27

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Slubberdegullion · 22/07/2008 12:33

¬ hey hey hey. I have a ¬ jobby too. And what is that then lapin?

{{{{{{{{{{ ~ }}}}}}}}}}}}}

Slubberdegullion · 22/07/2008 12:53

Is it a tap? ¬

or limp wristed? ¬

I'm not sure I'm allowed to say that.

Maybe it is a bookend that has toppled over.

¬

It's a funny wee thing, and there doesn't seem to be another one in reverse. It's all alone and unsymetrical

MrsBadger · 22/07/2008 13:01

it's a printing mark thing, isn't it?

Slubberdegullion · 22/07/2008 13:29

¬

hmm, yes, I'm sure you are right MrsB.

¬

It's growing on me now. I'm going to pop one in now and again and see if anyone notices.