I don't think toy guns cause real gun crime, not at all, but I've been thinking about this since there are some persuasive arguments for letting children have them made by custardo, tigermoth and others.
OK, they're toys, for one thing and don't actually hurt anyone and yes, boys in particular will make a gun out of something else if they're not allowed them. So forbidding them can make them attractive. But I forbid other things for the good of my son and it doesn't always make it more attractive. Anyway, if I think something is wrong or bad for him I will forbid it while I have the power to do so, so I'm not sure I could go with the 'I might as well let him have one since forbidding it makes it attractive' argument.
I also don't think that giving children toy guns teaches them that violence is acceptable but maybe it teaches them that guns are an everyday OK sort of object? No-one (I assume) has a problem with the fact that you can't buy sweet cigarettes any more because smoking is a stupid and dangerous thing to do and sweet cigarettes might encourage children to think smoking is OK. Is it different? Maybe, but the principle is similar. I also don't necessarily think playing with guns makes behaviour worse. Although I have seen a group of boys go off on an aggressive one while playing with them I've seen them do that without toy guns too.
Yes, of course children learn from what is around them and other general upbringing points are more important than the toy guns issue. I do also realise that it's all very well for us to sit here talking about whether we should allow toy guns or not when there are children growing up in poverty and surrounded by real guns and crime etc.
So I don't think toy guns cause gun crime, child violence (always) or future bad adult behaviour but I'm still uneasy about them. It's interesting though that some of you wouldn't let your kids take their toy guns out in public. How many other toys could you say that about? If it's not acceptable in public (I know, because it could be mistaken for a real one) why is it acceptable to have one? Not criticising anyone BTW, just think it's interesting.
So having gone through all that I think my objection to them is that they normalise something that is designed for killing and only killing. Playing screeching around corners with cars is different: cars aren't designed for car chases, they're designed to transport people.
Tigermoth and everyone else with older children, maybe I am being incredibly naive in thinking I can stem the flow of guns into the house as ds gets older but I'm going to have a good try anyway. I'll let you know in a few years!
While we're on the subject, a friend was trying to calm her son down (he was brandishing a large toy gun at another child) with the loud admonishment "xxx, put that down, it's NOT A WEAPON!" err, she then realised it was