Im really torn over this.
It was in my local paper.
Obviously as someone who waited 3 years with 2 children for a 3 bedroomed council house, who had to sleep in a single bed with DH, DS1 and have DS2 in a cot next to us in my mums box room I think its right that this woman should be asked to leave her home in order to house a family that needs it.
There are currently 507 'large' families In South Manchester waiting for a 6 bedroomed home. All who actully need 6 bedrooms unlike this woman who on;ly has 1 child.
However that is her family home. It was her mothers home who had many children and was justified living there, the tenancy was passed onto this lady when her mother died and now there are only her and her son years later.
The reason Im divided is that my granny lives alone in a 3 bedroomed house, she has lived there for over 40 years and by ratios if a 2 bedroomed house is too big for two then on the same principle they could move my Gran out of her 3 bedroomed house.
But I dont think they should IYKWIM. Shes lived there years.
When I needed a house I complained constantly (to myself not the council obviously) about all the old widows/ widowers living in 'family homes' but they have every right to be there.
Or do they?
Should 1 person be allowed to stay in a 3 bed house?
Should this woman and son be allowed to stay in a 6 bedroomed house?
She has been offered a 3 bedroomed house BTW, but not in her 'area'.
To me it seems obvious the woman should be moved but then where does it end IYKWIM.