Sorry, but I am really quite upset, and need to know if I have got things out of perspective.
I have an 'email friendship' with a man at work - it started by accident, but we found that we got on really well, had similar sense of humour, and similar opinions on work-related issues. However, politically / philosophically we are miles apart - sounds like a cliche, but he reads the DM, and I read the Guardian.
We have had many joky exchanges of the "Well you would think that, being a fascist DM reader", "easy for you to say reading that pinko scum rag" etc, etc, and have debated many issues where we have agreed to disagree. We have also talked about our families, and got quite close (I thought), but not too close iyswim (so no need to question me about that aspect of things).
Anyway, he's been a bit sharp and sarcastic with me for the last couple of days, but I've been holding my own, until we got onto the subject of dd1 - he knows the problems I've had with her and her anger (see many previous mumsnet threads). I was saying that I was very proud of her, she has been chosen to represent the school on a local radio programme, and I was saying that it is wonderful to know that she is always well behaved at school and outside the home, and people always compliment me on her mature behaviour. I said that it's good that she only gets angry at home, she obviously knows she is safe to 'vent' there.
(are you still with me?!)
This was his reply:
"I am lost for words. It is safe to vent at home eh???? A 14yr old by the name of Michael Hamer thought it was 'safe' to vent at home recently killing a young 11 yr boy with cystic fibrosis. This is undoubtedly the result of such a philosophy. Vent not thy anger I say, but deal with it constructively. There is no room for violence at home whatever form that takes........."
So, am I unreasonable to take great offence at this? I was close to tears after reading it.
Am I overreacting?