Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Other subjects

Is a book keeper the same as an auditor?

15 replies

SorenLorensen · 07/03/2006 14:37

And can a book keeper audit something, or can only an auditor audit? And is it book keeper or book-keeper?

Yes, I'm doing minutes again Grin Basically, someone has found the Parents' Commitee a new person to do the audit - an auditor - the last person was a book keeper, and I was wondering if they are one and the same or if an auditor would be insulted to be called a book keeper or, indeed, vice versa?

Nodded off yet? Zzzzzzzzzz....

OP posts:
dinosaur · 07/03/2006 14:39

No, they are not the same, or at least not necessarily the same. I think you could be a book-keeper without being qualified to be an auditor, but not vice versa.

PiccadillyCircus · 07/03/2006 14:40

As an auditor, an auditor would be likely to be able to book keep, but a book keeper would not neccessarily be able to audit.

An auditor would also be likely to have different qualifications from a bookkeeper. If someone described me as a bookkeeper I probably would be a little bit insulted Blush.

SorenLorensen · 07/03/2006 14:41

That's vaguely what I thought - auditor somehow sounds more imposing than book-keeper. Thanks, dino.

OP posts:
SorenLorensen · 07/03/2006 14:42

Thanks, PC - I'll put auditor.

OP posts:
PiccadillyCircus · 07/03/2006 14:42

It would be very unusual for an auditor not to be able to book keep, but they may have become a bit rusty depending on the area they are specialising in.

It also would be unlikely for a small organisation to have an audit, whereas all organisations should have the accounts kept (ie the book keeping part).

LIZS · 07/03/2006 14:44

Think an auditor would have financial training beyond book keeping.

SorenLorensen · 07/03/2006 14:50

PC - so it being called an annual audit may be kind of aggrandizement on someone's part? It's more likely just to be an annual review of accounts? Not that it really matters - I'm just interested. It's definitely been referred to as an audit at all the meetings I've been to.

OP posts:
iota · 07/03/2006 14:54

some useful info \link{http://www.charity-commission.gov.uk/publications/cc61.asp\here} re auditing accounts - is the PTA a registered charity?

Tinker · 07/03/2006 15:07

I'm asked to "audit" teh accounts of our social club at work. Consists of looking at about 10 pieces of paper usually. So, yes, aggrandisement.

RachD · 07/03/2006 22:38

Auditors are qualified after years of exams and experience.
Although there are recognised qualifications for book keepers, anyone could call themselves a bookkeeper.
Not the same thing at all.
I suspect that an auditor may be severely offended.

DaddyCool · 07/03/2006 22:43

but one thing is for sure.... we're all geeks.

NotActuallyAMum · 07/03/2006 22:56

Dunno but they both sound expensive to me

jura · 08/03/2006 00:15

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

SorenLorensen · 08/03/2006 15:46

Useful link, iota, thanks. You will all be glad to know I've revised the minutes and it now says "blah blah has found a new auditor for next year" instead of book-keeper. Don't want to offend her before she even starts!

The PTA is a registered charity and, as far as I understand it, the 'audit' is part of the annual report to the Charities Commission which we need to maintain our charitable status.

Whether it's a proper audit or not I don't know. I'm only the Secretary Grin And I don't do maths.

Thanks everyone though - most enlightening.

OP posts:
iota · 08/03/2006 15:55

SL our PTA is a reg charity too, so we have our accounts audited as per the Charity commission rules - but like you I'm only the Secretary, so all I do is file the report Grin

New posts on this thread. Refresh page