Moral judgements aside(or on another thread) i dont want to own up to it and DH will take the rap.
however i am not a legal mind but have been doing some research on legalities and think there is a loophole discovered very recently
now forgive me, i am a bit of a jumble. I think i understand the information but am not sure
the way i understand it is this
the NIP asks for a named driver - which you have to give details of or you are in BIG trouble.
so you give the details of the driver but dont sign the form
if you dont sign the form - it cannot go to court
and the cps will not accept it
and you get away with it
please legal beavers opinions needed urgently if you could explain in laymans terms if i am right , rather than a legal link ( which i have probably been to, but which i am unlikely to understand)
many thanks