Ooh inflammatory post dadslib! Can't quite buy your argument that women becoming (or being) capable of carrying out what were traditionally male jobs (your so called blue jobs) has "lead to alot of dis-enfranchised, disenchanted, disfunctional men. You say: 'Lager Louts', football hooligans, the work shy, wife beaters, kiddy porn perverts, child moletsers, armed criminals, etc..., all on the increase, may all be partly symptomatic of this." Come on! So poor men are feeling sorry and sad that some women are capable of mowing a lawn or changing a fuse? So they turn into child molesters (because they feel useless and inadequate) and it's WOMEN'S FAULT?! Please.
You also say "So don't you all think its about time that women took more responsibility for their liberation and helped men to find a 'New' role?" Err, No I don't. Why is it up to women to define a new role for men as a result of our supposed liberation? Hmmm? We can tell men what we want, sure but in many, many cases all women want to be treated more or less equally. That's not hard to grasp is it?
You then go on to say "After all, with equality comes responsibility". I'd just like to point out that women DON'T have equality, not at all. The pay gap is still there to name just one, huge example, despite sex discrimination legislation.
And you say "More women MP's is a good thing, but I don't see any of them championing mens issues, yet men, by the very laws those MP's create, have to consider women more equally and responsibly". Actually, the sex discrimination act applies to men as well but men just don't face as much discrimination so don't need to use it as much! MPs don't need to champion men's issues as much because men aren't the ones facing inequality at work, in childcare and at home if this thread's anything to go by!
you say the whole cycle will repeat itself. How? Do you it's likely that men will suddenly start being paid less for doing the same job as a woman? I doubt it.