Hello,
We've been sending our child to a London private nursery for the last 18 months for 3 days a week. They turned 3 years old over the summer and we've just been looking through the latest invoice that now supposedly accounts for the 30 (22 per week balanced over a year) free hours he is now entitled to.
The nursery operate an eight hour day, so a total of 24 hours over three days. I'm simplistically thought we'd have to pay for the additional two hours. Or perhaps two hours, plus an additional supplement for food/trips or other extras not included in the government funding.
In all honesty, I can't make head-nor-tail of the invoice but it is a little of two thirds of what I was originally paying - which is quite surprising given 22 of the 24 hours are supposedly "free".
With a bit of detective work, it seems like the nursery might be just subtracting the government payment for the 22hrs (which I understand is a little over £5/hour) from our regular bill.
I accept the fact that £5/hour isn't a very realistic figure for funding a nursery; but the nursery's approach feels like an absolute con. I'd always operated on the assumption that the eye-watering fees (nearly £90/day) went some way to subsidise the "free hours". The thought of enjoying some free hours certainly made paying the monthly bill a littler easier each of the last 18 months and our original selection of the nursery was partially on the basis that they "do the free hours".
As is stands, the rather than 30 free hours, it seems to more akin to "£5 subsidy per hour up to the first 30 hours".
It certainly feels like an absolute swizz.
I'm eyeing a future where we plan to move up to 5 days a week for the 3 year old and have what will be our 10 month old in for 3 days a week.
Having read around, I found a couple of posts from several years ago (when it was only 15hrs) where nurseries were doing similar things. But in the main, it seems like nurseries still find a way to get their money - by limiting hours-per-day or charging for lunch, or just having a limited number of places.
I'm assuming that the approach the nursery is taking is against the rules of the scheme?
Maybe all this is to be expected. AIBU? I don't really want to change nurseries. Appreciate I'm probably a bit naive and should have looked into this earlier, but I'm more than a bit irritated by the situation.
Grateful for any thoughts.