Hello all,
I have read around the internet for others that disagree with these 2 month notice periods that a lot of nurseries have.
I think the whole idea of 2 months notice is unfair and unreasonable.
Having looked through my contract with the nursery it is clear to see that these contracts are effectively based on employment contracts, with sections that 'allow' you 2 weeks holiday and the like.
Therefore I am going to challenge the right of a nursery to decide to go further than an employment contract, further than a rental contract, further than a mobile phone contract.... and pretty much any other contract in existence!
I would think that such a notice period would need to be justifiable.....
What are others thoughts?
I know some will say 'if its in the contract you have to pay' but I disagree.
If you were to go to an employment tribunal and were fighting your right to work for a competitor (quite a normal occurence), and your contract said you cannot, then you would win, if your contract said you cannot 'in the UK' you would win, if your contract said 'for a period of 12 months' you would win......
However if it said a specific competitor, or 6 months for example, or perhaps only within a specified geographic area..... then the judge would probably deem it fair and reasonable to apply with the terms of the contract.
But if a contract is deemed to be disproportionate and unreasonable in its make up then it is unenforceable.
What are peoples thoughts? anyone fought the argument before?
Regards,
Ben