Hello All,
So I was diagnosed with neurodiversities in adult years and have found 'knowing' helpful to better understand my quirks and struggles. Now, lets talk children - There have always (since pre-school) been mentions of 'dyslexic' traits in my son, and various people have picked up on 'quirks', but I'm conflicted about formal assessment. My opinion is, in school children should be monitored and aided with all and any struggles. I was recently asked to take my son to the GP for diagnosis because he is very distracted and cannot sit still. He is 7. Because obviously the GP wont refer for behaviours, I had a meeting with the SENCo.
I'm not convinced he needs behavioural assessments. I keep saying that if he didn't find learning and concentrating so difficult, he would engage better and thus be more stimulated by what he is meant to be doing. The SENCo agrees that we should implement supports and reassess these supports every few months, but I fear teachers focus more on 'annoying' behaviours than the child's academic struggles. Anyone else finding the system so frustrating? I don't think my son is busy to the point of needing diagnosis but I do feel like 'labels' make people more inclined to want to help the child with their struggles. Things like dyslexia are more of a silent struggle, so whilst I believe learning should be schools focus, they are more fixated on behavioural issues. The SENCo is however requesting visual assessments due to some academic struggles after I described some of the things he talks about like moving words, high contrast causing rainbowing and warped scenes suggesting the 'Alice in wonderland effect'.
Advice or golden nuggets from anyone would be uber helpful? TIA x
PS. Fidget toys etc help with social anxieties and boredom but are too distracting in class. They have now agreed to a doodle pad in class which is helping a little.