Hi OP,
I hope you'll tolerate another question-clump veering a little off topic. It's not very crisply expressed. Sorry! I do appreciate the thread very much, it is a useful thinking space where there is often a lot of vitriol.
You say 'most young children with learning difficulties are not autistic.' I think by 'learning difficulties' in this instance you mean IQ under 70, intellectual/academic disability - am I correct?
I am surprised a little by your terminology because 'learning difficulties' seems to be generally understood in the UK to mean specific things like dyslexia, dyspraxia etc where the general understanding is that the person is perfectly clever/capable but needs support in specific areas.
In any case I want a way of describing and discussing the IQ under 70 group for the rest of the question and I'll use Learning Disability (LD).
We have a DC diagnosed with 'Learning/Academic Disability/Dificulties'. (We were told she was not autistic, and that it was unnecessary to assess her to find out as her IQ is so low that is the only relevant factor. Her profile on the WISC was fairly level so it is probably a 'valid' IQ score ie not skewed by being averaged.) We tend to say 'Learning Disability' because out of that rather confusing diagnosis it is the most readily understood phrase.
However, most people are confused when we say our DC has a Learning Disability, and ask lots of follow up questions like 'disabled how?', 'what does that mean?', 'is she autistic?'. It just isn't very helpful as a descriptor or as a means of accessing services. We have never found a support group for parents of children with 'just' LD, though there are lots for parents of kids with autism or Downs Syndrome that might co-occur with learning disabilities. We have never met a child or adult with the same diagnosis as DC. This is very isolating, and quite surprising to me if it is in fact more common to have a LD just on its own, without autism.
I'd love to understand more about how you, as an EP, understand 'Learning Disability'. If most children with Learning Disability are not autistic, does that mean that there is a sizeable cohort who can only be described as 'Learning Disabled'? Or do they tend to have other co-morbidities, just not autism very often? Do you see any evidence of support/organisation/representation for this cohort and can you point me in the direction of any relevant support networks? Do you think it is important or beneficial to maintain that difference in description between what is commonly understood by 'learning difficulties' and words to describe the group with very low IQ?
I'm also interested in your opinion about the idea that DC's low IQ is the most salient factor, and whether or not autism is present is irrelevant. (It perhaps changes the picture to know that I have other DCs who have since been referred (in a different LA) for autism screening and I have strong suspicions about myself and DP (45 and 47 on the Cambridge AQ test!!).)
Thank you!!