Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Mumsnet classics

Relive the funniest, most unforgettable threads. For a daily dose of Mumsnet’s best bits, sign up for Mumsnet's daily newsletter.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Has DH got another think coming or have I got another thing coming???

812 replies

NotMyRealName2015 · 01/11/2015 14:56

I’ll clarify Blush

DH and I were having a light hearted debate about who was going to sort the garden out this afternoon (there are weeds growing out of weeds, and we have guests coming this week)
DH said that if I thought he was doing it today ‘I had another thing coming’.

I pointed out the phrase was ‘another think coming’ and that he should now go and do the garden as punishment for his failure. Grin
However, he is insisting I am wrong and that ‘thing’ is the right word. I say that doesn’t even make sense! What ‘thing’ is coming?? He just says ‘English doesn’t always make sense.’ (Not technically his first language but he has a British parent so has always been bilingual and is completely fluent)

MN jury needed. Who is correct??
Loser will obviously be doing the garden. Winner will sit down with coffee and biscuits, looking smug and saying 'you've missed a bit.'

OP posts:
FinestGrundyTurkey · 03/11/2015 23:22

Of course they are, catmilkman

Hahaha

Hmm
FinestGrundyTurkey · 03/11/2015 23:24

'Announce' means 'pronounce', yes?

BertieBotts · 03/11/2015 23:54

OH. Hackmum, that has just explained something to me.

I keep seeing people write "If I had of...." and being totally confused, wondering what on earth they've mistaken for that.

It must be "If I would have..." - shortened to "If I'd've". The Brit in them knows that somewhere in there should be "If I had" so interprets the "I'd" as I had, not I would, and then they do the old mishearing of 've as of. Therefore, if I would have becomes if I had of.

In British English we tend to use the past simple either for telling a sequential story (I saw him, I said hello and we chatted for a while and then...) or to ask a question about something which we already knew was on the case. So I'd never ask you "Did you see the new James Bond film?" if I had no idea whether you were a Bond fan. But if we'd spoken the week before and you'd expressed to me how interested you were in it, THEN I might ask in that way. Otherwise, we'd normally say "Have you seen the new Bond film?"

I have to disagree about may I have, though. It sounds old fashioned to my ears. Could I have is polite enough. Especially if you include please. I agree get is incorrect in BE.

Dumdedumdedum · 04/11/2015 05:54

It's not the difference between "may" and "could", surely, but the difference between "can" and "may"? Where "can" is wrong.

hackmum · 04/11/2015 07:42

BertieBotts - I hadn't seen that particular construction ("If I had of...") but I think you must be right! Tenses in English are very peculiar.

DadDadDad · 04/11/2015 08:00

catmilkman - I assume you are just having a bit of fun (writing "free" rather than "three"), but to quote this page again Language Log, the first example of "think" is from 1901, the first example of "thing" is from 1919, so according to you for 18 years, everyone was apparently doing it wrong until someone discovered the right way! (And OED says "thing" is a "misapprehension").

Dumdedumdedum · 04/11/2015 08:21

I am reminded that some time ago, I contributed "learning by rope" and "rope learning" to the Eggcorns forum, though I see it never made it to their database. Grin (Apparently widely used in Australia and South Africa to mean "learning by rote" and "rote learning".) If you think it's rope learning, not rote learning, you've got another think coming Grin.

MaidOfStars · 04/11/2015 08:53

Dum That might be a jumbling of 'learning the ropes' and 'learning by rote'?

Dumdedumdedum · 04/11/2015 09:00

Yes, MaidOfStars, that sounds plausible. Apparently, a popular eggcorn for "rote learning" is "route learning". Hmm

WizardOfToss · 04/11/2015 11:04

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

hellsbellsmelons · 04/11/2015 11:42

Well every day is a school day on MN.
I always thought it was thing.
Now I know I shall use it correctly.

DadDadDad · 04/11/2015 12:03

hells - a thing-er who has read the thread and changed her mind - wow, you will be a like drops of cooling rain on some of the fevered brows on this thread! Grin

maizieD · 04/11/2015 12:09

I am now completely Shock Shock Shocked by 'learning by rope'.

SeekEveryEveryKnownHidingPlace · 04/11/2015 12:15

DadDadDad - you keep talking about 'rage' and 'fevered brows' and 'getting upset': I'm sure it isn't meant to, but it comes over as a rather patronizing tone, as though you're enjoying the thought of posters being really rather crosser than they are, and I'm not sure why.

purpleponcho · 04/11/2015 12:33

Agreed, SeekEvery.

DadDadDad · 04/11/2015 12:42

Sorry - it was meant to be light-hearted. I just see the humour: you get lengthy, thoughtful discussion about the topic, then someone pops up 500 posts in with "It's definitely thing" then disappears again, leaving others talking about banging their head or chewing their arm off!

It just struck me as such a rare contrast for someone to come on and say they'd read the thread and changed their mind, it tickled me, and I tried to express that in an entertaining way.

I really take on board that it might be patronising - not my intention.

SeekEveryEveryKnownHidingPlace · 04/11/2015 12:47

Oh yes - I was struck by the unusual tone of that post, too!

Please don't think I'm trying to make a personal attack or tell you how to post: I've just noticed a fair bit of this - clearly unintentional - hyperbole in posts about posters' opinions on this matter. Thanks for taking it on board.

DadDadDad · 04/11/2015 13:04

I will make a confession: Blush I do get some amusement from those who get very wound up about language errors - but it's not to mock those who take grammar and spelling seriously (I like to think I take it seriously too).

It's more about getting a bit of perspective on a tendency I see in myself too, that when someone's English is wrong, or they argue for a usage I can't agree with, that feeling of tension, almost of threat. Why do we feel that? Why do we think the world is going to end because another person has written "I would of told him..."? If you open a published book or a newspaper, these errors are rare (so we notice them when they do slip through), so I think it's one of those perception biases to feel no-one speaks proper English any more. I'm genuinely curious at the way people react, and wouldn't want to patronise those who feel differently from me.

Bluewombler2k · 04/11/2015 13:09

Can I ask: Is it 'swap' or 'swop'?? I always spell it with an a but have increasingly seen it spelt with an o recently

MitzyLeFrouf · 04/11/2015 13:11

'Swop' looks may shades of wrong to me but I believe both or correct.

MitzyLeFrouf · 04/11/2015 13:12

Eeek!

'are' correct!

(wrong thread for a typo)

FattyNinjaOwl · 04/11/2015 13:16

I always write swap. Swop doesn't look right. Confused

hellsbellsmelons · 04/11/2015 13:35

This thread is blowing my mind.
Now I can use swop as well as swap.
The world is my oyster!

Dumdedumdedum · 04/11/2015 13:43

Umm - I was the one biting my own arm off (yes, it should have been chewing, I now remember!) at thing, and all I can say is, I accidentally missed out the self-mocking emoticon!

Jux · 04/11/2015 13:52

Swop is to Swap as Woz is to Was. Grin