Reform of the libel laws - add your support here

[JustineMumsnet]

As you know we've been banging on about libel and the need to reform the current law since our not so private little spat with Gina Ford. So we're delighted to offer support to the Libel Reform Campaign, a joint campaign organised by the Index on Censorship, English PEN, and Sense about Science. The aim is to put pressure on the government to introduce legislation to reform the England's libel laws.

In the words of Jonathan Heawood, Director of English PEN: 'Our libel laws allow people accused of funding terrorism or dumping toxic waste in Africa to silence their critics, while 'super-injunctions' stop the public from even knowing that such allegations exist.' John Kampfner, CEO of Index on Censorship, says: 'If we don't act we're at risk of becoming a global pariah.' And Justine Roberts (who she?) adds: 'These are print laws for a digital age.'

Justice Secretary Jack Straw announced a review of libel laws at the end of last year, with the aim of introducing secondary legislation before the end of this parliament. If you'd like to pile the pressure on, please add your voice to the petition here.

Done.

Along with the letter to MP.

Done. Some of the recent cases and threats against scientists have been outrageous - eg
this one.

the libel laws are not working as they should. I'd rather see some suggestions for how they might be reformed but I have signed anyway.

Betetr to do personal letters or e-mails to MPs. No point in contacting mine as they have no interest in constituents unless they are members of their party or donating money to them.

I have missed all this - it is very interesting

I love it that right of the end of the article posted by Grimma, that the company responsible for the agent says "we have used this on 1.2 million people and there have been no adverse effects in 99.5% of people"

Oh, so 600,000 is an acceptable number is it?

I don't suppose I will ever understand why people think they can stop people saying things because they consider it to be not right.......if someone is saying something that is not correct, well, erm.....correct them. What is the big deal?

Done!

Done

LBB - 600,000 is half of 1.2 million.

I think you mean 6000, which is still quite a lot.

Yeah that is exactly what I meant

Done - and the letter I shall do this evening

obviously this will never affect ME but I've signed anyway ...

Done

Done, will do the letter when I get 5 minutes where the baby is crying

Have done the letter, only takes 30 seconds

Done and wrote to my MP*. My MP wrote back to say that he has raised the matter with the minister at the Ministry of Justice and he will keep me advised of his response.

*Although obviously cannot see "MP" now without thinking "morningpaper"

I have done so already but thank you, Justine for alerting us.

This is a very important issue - witness the science writer Simon Singh's case: latest on Jack of Kent's blog (if you're on twitter and are interested you might like to follow him on @jackofkent ) or take a look at sense about science.

Plus the case of cardiologist Peter Wilmshurst who is being sued over his criticisms of an American trial of a heart implant.

I agree entirely with mumsnet's statement:

'We would stress that we accept that individuals have a right to protect their reputations. However, this right always has to be balanced against the rights of others to freedom of expression. At present we believe that this balance is not struck in the right place.'

And add that unless scientists, journalists and bloggers are at liberty to present their findings without fear, we are all affected: via issues of health, politics and even in education.

Done.

Done.

Done.

Done

done

Done

bump

And me