Just looking at the F&F ratings
www.england.nhs.uk/ourwork/pe/fft/friends-and-family-test-data/
There is a data set for March 2016 based on Post-natal ward responses (there is also another set in the same data for post natal community responses which is relevant to this)
This won't copy terribly well here but I will try anyway as I think its of interest to people and its a pain to go to the right excel spreadsheet for a lot.
I have just copied the Area / Trust, the number of responses that month, and the percentage who WOULD NOT recommend.
First of all by region:
NHS England London 2,483 / 4%
NHS England South West 777 / 2%
NHS England West Midlands 1,135 / 2%
NHS England Central Midlands 1,270 / 2%
NHS England Lancashire & Greater Manchester 708 / 2%
NHS England South East 1,240 / 2%
NHS England Cheshire & Merseyside 325 / 2%
NHS England North Midlands 747 / 2%
NHS England Cumbria & North East 852 / 2%
NHS England Wessex 527 / 2%
NHS England South Central 427 / 1%
NHS England East 950 / 1%
NHS England Yorkshire & Humber 1,247 / 1%
The problem at first glance looks most acute in London. Which doesn't entirely surprise me.
London has been known for the worst midwife ratios for some time, though I can't find any current data (DOES ANYONE HAVE THIS?)
This map from 2011 was the most recent I could find.
www.theguardian.com/society/2013/aug/18/midwife-crisis-lets-down-mothers This Guardian article from 2013 is worth reading as a bit of background as they think it will be 2026 before there will be anywhere near enough midwives.
The Care Quality Commission (CQC), the NHS care regulator, last year warned that one in seven of the 141 hospital trusts in England that provide maternity services did not have enough midwives. Maternity care was "emerging as a problem area for a number of NHS trusts, due to midwife numbers not increasing in line with demand and an increase in complex births, owing to risk factors such as maternal age, weight and co-morbidity", it said
I have to ask, JUST HOW MUCH IS ACTUALLY BEEN DONE TO ENSURE THIS DOESN'T SLIP BACK EVEN FURTHER???! We need to know, what has been done in the last 3 years other than pay us all lip service, in order to put on more pressure.
Anyway, back to those Friends and Family figures for March by Trust taken in a post-natal ward setting.
I've listed every Trust here with 5% or more would not recommend figure:
please also note the number of responses as well as the percentage of women who would not recommend as it affects the data reliability
I would also point out, is this a true reflection or do women in certain areas have higher expectations? as another cavet
THE ROYAL WOLVERHAMPTON 118 / 10%
YEOVIL DISTRICT HOSPITAL 55 / 9%
DORSET COUNTY HOSPITAL 35 / 9%
POOLE HOSPITAL 24 / 8%
BARTS HEALTH 53 / 8%
UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON HOSPITALS 165 / 7%
NORTH BRISTOL 84 / 7%
BRIGHTON AND SUSSEX UNIVERSITY 86 / 7%
CHELSEA AND WESTMINSTER 174 / 7%
GUY'S AND ST THOMAS' 112 / 6%
BOLTON NHS 48 / 6%
UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF SOUTH MANCHESTER 48 / 6%
BEDFORD HOSPITAL 51 / 6%
LANCASHIRE TEACHING HOSPITALS 35 / 6%
LIVERPOOL WOMEN'S 18 / 6%
TORBAY AND SOUTH DEVON 36 / 6%
ROYAL CORNWALL 73 / 5%
CENTRAL MANCHESTER UNIVERSITY 76 / 5%
LEWISHAM AND GREENWICH 211 / 5%
NORTH MIDDLESEX UNIVERSITY 60 / 5%
MID CHESHIRE HOSPITALS 42 / 5%
SOUTHPORT AND ORMSKIRK 63 / 5%
CHESTERFIELD ROYAL 64 / 5%
UNITED LINCOLNSHIRE 66 / 5%
GREAT WESTERN 22 / 5%
I also had a look at the results for Ante-natal / Birth / Post - Natal in the community. There are percentages as high as 22% for one Trust for Ante-natal care.
Compare this with the same thing but for General Inpatients as a reference point to see whether post natal wards (maternity in general) are scoring badly or not:
ASPEN - PARKSIDE HOSPITAL 9 / 11%
MEDWAY 1,279 / 9%
CHELSEA AND WESTMINSTER 1,678 / 6%
ROYAL FREE LONDON 1,279 / 5%
BEDFORD HOSPITAL 394 / 5%
SHEFFIELD CHILDREN'S 868 / 5%
NORTHAMPTON GENERAL 1,633 / 5%
Oh.
Is all I have to say to that comparison.
The figures need a lot more looking at as these are monthly figures and so may not be as reflective as they could be, but there certainly seems to be a pattern there.