My ex has always been sporadic is his access to my dd and I have had one maintenance payment so far this year.
When he has dd (3.10) he can't be bothered getting up on time with her to take her to her gym class ( whihc she loves going to) and I tend to get her back hungry, dirty, tired and in a very difficult mood. She has been referred to a child mental health specialist due to her temper tantrums and behaviour issues which are always ten times worse after spending time with her dad. The specialist agrred with me that many of dd probelms were due to the irregularity and sporadic nature of her dads access, despite being in the room and hearing this things ahve not improved. We have had periods where he hasn't seen her for six weeks or more and she has become a different child, so chilled and content.
My ex works for his family and every month they find a reason to not pay maintenance which should be taken outof his wage as he doesn't pay it voluntarily. The CSa have told me that as he works for his family who are intent on playing the system it is unlikely I will ever see any maintenance so I am wasting my time. I should now give up and if I want to take the matter any further I should speak to the Inland revenue.
Yesterday I lost my temper so phoned inland revenue to report him and his family for tax fraud, I know they pay him to remove money from the business to reduce their tax bill as well as paying my ex a pittance on paper but paying him a lot more cash in hand.
I then phoned ex and told him I was sick of him upsetting dd, he was at the root of her behaviour problems, he was a crap father and I never wanted to see him again especially around my daughter and that he could take his money and shove it where the sun don;t shine. I woud be happier to struggle without his help than demean my dd and myself by asking a man puts more effort into fiddling the system than being a father.
I anticipate a solicitor's letter coming through the door in the next few weeks ! Can I fight him or is he entitled access to his "dd" even if he iis doing more harm than good?