Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Money matters

Find financial and money-saving discussions including debt and pension chat on our Money forum. If you're looking for ways to make your money to go further, sign up to our Moneysaver emails here.

Is this legal? What are the implications for the future if I agree? WWYD

59 replies

ChickenWoman · 29/01/2010 18:06

Dad wants to sell me his house. He'll put the money for a diposit in my account and then I'll buy it. 2 weeks I'll sell it back to him for the same price and he'll pay me the money and then I'll give it back to him.

I 'think' this is legal, but would the deposit money and then the sale money be seen as 'income' and impact on my carers allowance?

Appreciate any help/advice! I'd like to help if I can.

OP posts:
Chickenwoman · 29/01/2010 21:57

Okay, - so this is what it is all about:

They have two houses in joint names. They want to move to having 1 house each, but if they each 'gift' the half to the other, they'll have to pay CGT on the half that they receive.

So, the idea is that they sell the 2nd small house to me and pays CGT, he gifts his half of the 1st big house to my mum without CGT as this is allowed.

He is then house-less so buys the house back from me at the same price, so I don't have to pay CGT. Then he builds and extention on it, and also a granny flat which he lives in whils the sells the now bigger 2nd house and lives on the money as his pension.

I think that is it. Mum and Dad are left with a house each and a pension which neither have been saving for because they have put all their money into their houses but were affected by the endowment thingy that went tits-up.

OP posts:
EldonAve · 29/01/2010 22:43

can't they just claim to live together?
then no CGT would be payable

Quattrocento · 29/01/2010 23:24

Just finished tax return - yay!

I can't help with this any more CW. The sale and repurchase from you makes no sense at all from a tax planning perspective and doesn't achieve what he thinks it achieves.

I think he should stop involving you in hare-brained schemes and go and see an accountant/

IsItMeOr · 30/01/2010 08:34

I don't think you've appreciated the significance of this from Rebeccaj:

By Rebeccaj Fri 29-Jan-10 20:28:45

"If you sell, give or otherwise dispose of a property (that's not your main home) to any other family member - or to a spouse or civil partner that you haven't lived with during that tax year - you'll have to work out the gain or loss made and any Capital Gains Tax due."

So, my reading is that, even if your dad buys the property back from you at the same value, if the market value had increased, you would still be liable to pay CBT based on the market value.

If you don't have time to investigate this yourself, I would suggest you politely explain to your dad that you aren't able to help him until your court case is sorted. He is trying to guilt you into helping him by implying that this is the only way for him and your mum to have a pension.

cleanandclothed · 30/01/2010 13:32

I think there are still some issues with this. I have copied your explanation and added my comments. I am not clear who lives in which house - or who used to live there, and this is key.

They have two houses in joint names.

Was one the house they lived in when they were together? And does you dad still live there?

They want to move to having 1 house each, but if they each 'gift' the half to the other, they'll have to pay CGT on the half that they receive.

No, that's not quite true, the seller/gifter may need to pay CGT, the purchaser would need to pay stamp duty land tax.

So, the idea is that they sell the 2nd small house to me and pays CGT,

OK - you need to pay stamp duty (£1,500 on a £150k houese) and you pay half the money to you r mum and half to your dad. As I presume this is a house neither of them have lived in, they both need to pay CGT.

he gifts his half of the 1st big house to my mum without CGT as this is allowed.

The 'without CGT' bit I think is because this is the house they have as their principal private residence? If he lives in it at present, and has done all the time they owned it then he can give or sell it without CGT, but this is the case whetheer or not he has another house. If he hasn't/doesn't live there, then a sale/gift may well attract CGT anyway. So either this works without you buying the first house, or it doesn't work at all.

And this leaves your mum with half of the money from the first house, and the whole of the second one. Is she just going to give the money you have paid her back to your dad? If she is, then Quattro is right and the whole thing is likely to be treated as a 'sham' - ie it won't achieve whatever they want it to as the transactions will not be 'true' transactions.

He is then house-less so buys the house back from me at the same price, so I don't have to pay CGT.

OK, but he will now have to pay stamp duty, another £1,500.

Then he builds and extention on it, and also a granny flat which he lives in whils the sells the now bigger 2nd house and lives on the money as his pension.

OK. He may have to pay CGT on this sale.

I think that is it. Mum and Dad are left with a house each and a pension which neither have been saving for because they have put all their money into their houses but were affected by the endowment thingy that went tits-up.

There is as I mentioned earlier, a mismatch of where the money ends up, aas you end up with the original £20k gifted, and your mum ends up with a house plus half the proceeds of the other one. So you Dad may not be able to buy the house back. If you both just give the money back to your Dad these are not genuine transactions.

The only thing this acchieves with any certainty is the requirement to pay at least £3k stamp duty, plus a lot of hassle and risk. Basically your mum and dad need to take advice on the principal private residence relief situation for separated couples. But please don't do this without investigating it a bit more.

Ivykaty44 · 30/01/2010 14:01

TBH I wouldn't get involved - as you maybe the one left having to pay tax... on something you never really owned and money you never really had.

If you claim tc or ctc then deff stay well out of it - as you will have an inflated income for one year and mess yourself up completly due to your involvments

Rebeccaj · 31/01/2010 18:16

Also.....if your Dad gives you 20k as a deposit, I think this could have serious implications for your tax credits/allowances/benefits situation, as the benefits agencies will see it as income. The fact you then "spend"it on a house is irrelevant - it still gives you a 20k pot of money, and you could find yourself seriously down in allowances etc if they think it's your money. I wouldn't touch this with a bargepole, honestly, it's far too much potential downside for very little upside.

Chickenwoman · 31/01/2010 21:42

Cleanandclothed

Thank you for your detailed post.

'They have two houses in joint names.'

Yes

'Was one the house they lived in when they were together?'

Yes 20 years ago

'And does you dad still live there?'

No, he lives in their second home and has done for 20 years.

'They want to move to having 1 house each, but if they each 'gift' the half to the other, they'll have to pay CGT on the half that they receive.'

Yes

'No, that's not quite true, the seller/gifter may need to pay CGT, the purchaser would need to pay stamp duty land tax.'

Okay, but because they are married, they are both the sellers and the gifters i.e. they share everything like any normal married couple.

'So, the idea is that they sell the 2nd small house to me and pays CGT,'

'OK - you need to pay stamp duty (£1,500 on a £150k houese) and you pay half the money to you r mum and half to your dad. As I presume this is a house neither of them have lived in, they both need to pay CGT.'

No, I just pay the money to my dad. He has lived their 20years. 'They' are selling it but I'll just pay him, because they are married I suppose!? He'll pay me the stamp duty so I can pay it.

'he gifts his half of the 1st big house to my mum without CGT as this is allowed.'

'The 'without CGT' bit I think is because this is the house they have as their principal private residence? If he lives in it at present, and has done all the time they owned it then he can give or sell it without CGT, but this is the case whetheer or not he has another house. If he hasn't/doesn't live there, then a sale/gift may well attract CGT anyway. So either this works without you buying the first house, or it doesn't work at all.'

This confuses me a bit. He and my mum have not lived together for 20 years, although they both spend nights at each others houses. They are both in joint names.

'And this leaves your mum with half of the money from the first house, and the whole of the second one. Is she just going to give the money you have paid her back to your dad? If she is, then Quattro is right and the whole thing is likely to be treated as a 'sham' - ie it won't achieve whatever they want it to as the transactions will not be 'true' transactions.'

I'm not going to pay my mum any money at all.

'He is then house-less so buys the house back from me at the same price, so I don't have to pay CGT.
OK, but he will now have to pay stamp duty, another £1,500.'

Yes

'Then he builds and extention on it, and also a granny flat which he lives in whils the sells the now bigger 2nd house and lives on the money as his pension.'

'OK. He may have to pay CGT on this sale.'

Not if it is his primary residence perhaps?

'I think that is it. Mum and Dad are left with a house each and a pension which neither have been saving for because they have put all their money into their houses but were affected by the endowment thingy that went tits-up.'

'There is as I mentioned earlier, a mismatch of where the money ends up, aas you end up with the original £20k gifted, and your mum ends up with a house plus half the proceeds of the other one. So you Dad may not be able to buy the house back. If you both just give the money back to your Dad these are not genuine transactions.'

My mum won't have anything to do with it really. I will end up with the original £20k gifted which I am expected to give back. My mum won't have half the procedes of the one I buy I shouldn't think.

'The only thing this acchieves with any certainty is the requirement to pay at least £3k stamp duty, plus a lot of hassle and risk. Basically your mum and dad need to take advice on the principal private residence relief situation for separated couples. But please don't do this without investigating it a bit more'

Yes I think he was counting on just the £3k plus transation fees.

OP posts:
Chickenwoman · 31/01/2010 21:45

Thank you to the others of you that have posted. I think he is planning to compensate me for any loss of tax relief.

Perhaps the best thing to do is insist on what was suggested earlier, that he pays for me to see my own accountant/solicitor with their remit being my interests only and see what they say.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page