I have come up with a plan for the proceeds of the sale of my mum's house (she died in 2008). We don't have the money yet but it should be a sizeable amount. After some money we want to set aside we have around £50 000 for use in investments or mortgage.
Let me explain the background.
I do have some small investments and do understand that long term this is probably the best use for the money. I also understand that in terms of borrowed money, mortgage money is among the cheapest you can get.
However, these are our personal circumstances.
I am a SAHM, and wish to remain that way. I have a two year old and am expecting my second child.
DH earns a salary on which he could raise about £105 000. We think we may be able to persuade a mortgage company to give us £120 000. We currently have a very small house and may want a bigger one in a few years.
We currently have a mortgage of £119 000
DH's job is also not that certain, although we would have several years notice if he was actually to be made redundant. If he was, we would probably relocate to Spain, where there are more jobs in his line.
So, I don't feel we are necessarily in a position to put the money in a long-term investment as we may have need of it soon.
I don't feel that a high interest savings acount would do much for us.
My plan is this (and bear in mind that we are relatively good at sticking to a limited budget): Put £50 000 into the mortgage, still to be paid off over 25-30 years. This would reduce our mortgage (we currently have a bad deal) by about £400 and would save us money even with the early get out fee. We would then save the £400 as a nest egg to set aside possibly having a period of unemployment and relocation expenses.
Are there any obvious flaws here that we have missed, because it looks pretty good to us? We can't really afford to get this wrong!