Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Money matters

Find financial and money-saving discussions including debt and pension chat on our Money forum. If you're looking for ways to make your money to go further, sign up to our Moneysaver emails here.

Do you think absent fathers should always be pursued for child maintenance if they are working?

19 replies

electra · 04/11/2009 12:36

?

OP posts:
VinegarTitsOnFire · 04/11/2009 12:38

Yes

QueenOfFlamingEverything · 04/11/2009 12:39

Yes of course they should.

MuGGGhoulWump · 04/11/2009 12:40

Yes.

electra · 04/11/2009 12:41

I am interested in getting opinions on this as I have a 6 month old. Her father lives in Sicily and has never shown any interest in her whatsoever.

I found out via 'his camp' that he has started a new job which was described as 'national work'. I always thought it would be impossible to get any child support for her from him but I have recently found out it is possible if you go through your local magistrates court as the UK has a REMO agreement with Italy.

As I am now having to make a claim against the father of my older girls because he has decided he wants to pay off his credit cards instead(!!) it got me thinking that maybe I should also try to get a contribution from dd3's father, given that I am unable to work currently.

OP posts:
kidcreoleandthecoconuts · 04/11/2009 12:43

Yes obviously.

GuyFawkesIsMyLoveSlave · 04/11/2009 12:44

Yes. Or, at least, I'm wary of saying "always" and I could see that there might be exceptions (although I can't immediately think what they could be) but in general yes.

I suppose one exception would be if the resident parent is self-sufficient, has oodles of cash and doesn't want child maintenance from the absent parent -- hard to see who would benefit from the pursuing in that case.

MuGGGhoulWump · 04/11/2009 12:45

I'm currently going through the Australian CSA for maintenance.
It can be done, I've been granted money, but not as much as he can afford. I've forms here now to fill in to get them to investigate his finances further.

I'll keep pushing until I am satisfied he is paying the correct amount.

kidcreoleandthecoconuts · 04/11/2009 12:45

Sorry x posts! Well it's worth a try isn't? How sad that he has no interest . His loss I say

GuyFawkesIsMyLoveSlave · 04/11/2009 12:45

Cross-posted. In your case, yes, definitely.

VinegarTitsOnFire · 04/11/2009 12:46

He was absent when she was concieved, he may choose to not be in her life physically but i dont see why that makes him finicially ammune. He still has a responsibility to support her financially

VinegarTitsOnFire · 04/11/2009 12:47

I mean wasnt absent (unless it was an immaculate conception )

Kewcumber · 04/11/2009 12:57

yes always

electra · 04/11/2009 13:08

Thanks for replies. I am thinking that I should at least try for her sake, really.

OP posts:
electra · 04/11/2009 14:57

I have his home address but should I also provide information about where he was working when he was in the UK in case they need it to trace him?

OP posts:
MuGGGhoulWump · 04/11/2009 15:00

Give them everything you can. The more information you have, the more likely they are to trace him. It'll also help them get an idea of his income.

electra · 06/11/2009 21:13

God, I have found out today from someone that he is actually back in the UK, working again so will this make it easier or harder, I wonder?

OP posts:
violethill · 07/11/2009 12:23

Yes, definitely. No one should be allowed to have children and not support them financially when they are earning.

TrillianAstra · 07/11/2009 12:37

at VT's absent when conceived

Yes, of course both parents should contribute to the costs of children they made together.

Unless, I don't know, you poked holes in a condom with a pin or something.

mummywoowoo · 18/11/2009 21:57

of course -whyever not?!

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread