The fact of the matter is we need somewhere to live. We want a home. My son is about to start school and although we have had our financial difficulties (we are paying off our final debt at a crippling amount a month) my partner IS in a relatively well-paid, steady job. He works his arse off and we have no disposable income. I cannot put myself at the mercy of the council to rehouse me - I cannot have that uncertainty hanging over mine and my children's future. So we will beg, borrow or steal money to get us a new rental property and hope to god that we can get our £800 deposit back.
I read your link GentleOtter thanks for that - I think I tried reading it before and came to the same conclusion - it's so confusing and seemingly contradictory - for instance:
- Does a tenant under a short assured tenancy have security of tenure?
Only during the agreed period of the let. During that time, a tenant with a short assured tenancy cannot be evicted as long as he does not break any of the tenancy conditions. At the end of the agreed period the landlord has the right to apply for repossession if he wants. But the tenant can still stay on until the court grants the landlord an order for possession.
That sounds as if we are in the right here and an injustice has been done but then:
- . Grounds 1 to 8 what are those mandatory grounds (for the courts to grant the landlord an order of possession)?
If one of the following grounds is established the court must grant the landlord an order for possession.
Ground 1: either:
a. the house was the landlord's only or principal home at any time before the tenancy was granted; or
b. the landlord needs the property for himself or his spouse for use as the principal home of one or both of them and did not become the landlord through buying the house or otherwise acquiring it for value.
So point 30 basically says (if I am understanding it correctly) that the court will grant the landlord an order for possession if he wants to move back in - doesn't it?
We received in the post today a Form AT6 - a Notice under section 19 of Intention to Raise Proceedings for posession - which states that he intends to apply to the SHerriff for an order for possession of the house.
I could sit here and wait out the next 2 months and then let the landlord go to the courts to gain possession - we could then wait for the courts to do their thing and then by Sept/Oct be out on our ear - or we could launch into a legal challenge and the landlord either wins and we get hit with costs- or the landlord gives up and then waits till December and then we have to get out then at the end of our tenancy. How horrendous would that time be? How Homely would we make our home in the knowledge that we are not going to be in it for much longer?? The stress would be horrendous.
I would rather get out now - get settled into a new home and put this experience down to bad luck. I am actually feeling that I am going to explode and that't not going to get better if I am involved in protracted wranglings.
I will take this paperwork along to the Citizen's Advice - but I think what I really need is the advice of a really good solicitor who can do an initial assessment of our situation for free? I'd like to know whether we have any grounds to gain compensation for this even if we end up vacating in the next month or two.
I'm sorry you went through something similar to this GentleOtter because I wouldn't wish this on anyone.