Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Money matters

Find financial and money-saving discussions including debt and pension chat on our Money forum. If you're looking for ways to make your money to go further, sign up to our Moneysaver emails here.

Criminal Convictions - who can find out?

32 replies

Technofairy · 23/04/2009 21:22

One of DP's colleagues confided in him today that he was recently caught drink driving. It hasn't come to court yet but he is expecting a years ban at the very least. Quite rightly so.

He occasionally needs to travel with work and has up to now used hire cars, which is the norm where they work. Non drivers use the train. Whilst he is fairly confident that he can come up with some excuse as to why he now wants to use the train for business journeys he is worried that there is some way that his employers will be able to find out about his conviction, when it occurs, as it would be considered to be misconduct and could result in disciplinary action. He could lose his job.

Neither I or DP have the first idea about this but I thought that someone here might. I can remember that years ago our local paper used to publish a list every day of verdicts at the magistrates court (yes, really!) but this no longer happens. Is there any way that his employers would be informed of his conviction by the court or is there some sort of information source that they could consult? Convictionsareus.com for example.

I wouldn't normally go to so much trouble as to ask about something like this but this chap was so lovely when DS was ill and helped us in so many ways that I do actually feel sorry for him even though by his own admission he's been a right dickhead.

OP posts:
pavlovthepregnantcat · 26/04/2009 18:45

12am not 12pm!

MIAonline · 26/04/2009 19:09

I am sorry technofairy to have got into the debate, but just couldn't let Tonyalmeida's comments pass. Your OP was worded in such a way that it didn't open up the debate, However, if you didn't want the debate to continue you should have perhaps not gone onto talk about how the the drunk driver had got himself convicted and perhaps subsequent posts would have respected your request to deal with the issues now facing your friend.

Technofairy · 26/04/2009 20:04

I think the debate would have carried on regardless.

I just wanted to clarify that he didn't get shitfaced and then jump into his car and drive off, which was clearly the assumption.

He's decided that he's going to tell work what has happened rather than have to worry about them finding out. DP doubts that his employers will discipline him but has advised him to speak to the union rep.

OP posts:
hf128219 · 26/04/2009 20:12

Pavlov - your figures are correct but alcohol starts to leave the system one hour after starting drinking.

So start at 9pm you will be free of a 12 unit bottle of wine at 10am the next day.

pavlovthepregnantcat · 26/04/2009 20:16

I stand corrected! We usually tell people to start the 'countdown' from when they stop drinking, I guess its just easier, but you are right, and I am wrong!

pavlovthepregnantcat · 26/04/2009 20:18

Technofairy - I am sure that is the right course of action. It is much better to be honest from the off. A discipline is not so bad if he does not lose his job.

I know some-one who lost a job as she did not tell her new employers about a recent ban due to dd, and they did a CRB and found out. They told her that if she had been honest about it straight away, they would have still offered her the job.

hf128219 · 26/04/2009 20:21

Just remembering my Forensic Medicine at Glasgow Uni!

Techno - good call. His work (and the magistrates) will take the 'morning after' situation into consideration.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page