Merely curious.
We approached this issue with my mum 2 years ago when she was 73, a year after my dad died (she inherited). Anyway, it didn't go down at ALL well!..
"I'll decide what I do with my money, thank you very much!"
Well, no, mum, the idea is I will decide what to do with your money, SHOULD THE NEED ARISE, to benefit you as far as I can! However, it'll be a damn sight harder if I have to GET power of attorney THEN!
Thing is, I have a profligate brother.... (always the favoured child!). He is single, and in financial strife, and we're both in our late 40's. We get on OK. I 'gently' put it to mum that my brother would, when push came to shove, put mum in the cheapest council care he could find if the alternative was compromising his inheritance. He already, on THE EVE of dad's wake asked mum to change her will so as to give him half of the inheritance (as opposed to 2/5 per child, him and me; 1/5 going to 'any grandchildren' ie MY DSs as luck would have it!). As far as I'm concerned, the money isn't an issue. We (DH and I) are financially reasonably well set up because we're both quite responsible! What IS an issue is the hell-on battle that could so EASILY occur with my brother if the day comes where we need to sell mum's house to fund her care. I appreciate a time comes, legally where we might have to but I'd rather sell earlier and fund better care. I'm not Mrs Goody 2 shoes here, just a responsible DD who recognises what needs to be done. But it pisses me off that mother is obstructing this!
I genuinely don't think (and hope that's why!) mother understands what power of attorney means. I was going to get her solicitor's receptionist to randomly send mum a brochure about PoA but was really worried the note might say 'Dear Mrs X, find enclosed the brochure as requested by your daughter'!