Apologies if I get wording/terms wrong but just wondered if anyone could help me to understand things better.
Redundancies at dps work and looks like its between dp and another guy who works there. They were told that whoever goes comes down to 3 things, scores for each would be given as points, and person with the least would be the one leaving.
Working it out approx dp thought that he might be able to scrape by due to a higher scores for all 3 catagories (Im sorry Im trying to explain without too much detail).
Hes just been informed by the other guy that hes got someone from a trade union to sit in with him during his meeting (all given a meeting to explain their side etc) and that if he's told he has the lowest score and therefor has to go, the trade union can overrule/change the decision so that he stays and therefor dp will be the one to leave.
Im trying to stay rational, dp is understandably crapping it. In my opinion (counts for zero I know) that cant be fair - if he can have the decision changed then surely the 'points scoring' system counts for shit? And therefor why should dp necessarily be the next one to go when theres many other workers there and the scores wouldnt mean anything?
Dont get me wrong - if dp has to go he has to go but this just doesnt seem right?
If you can understand through any of this well done!