Both my husband and I have recently had salary increases and we're considering taking some equity (around £50k) out of our house to buy an additional property to rent out. We'd be looking at flats around £150k to £200k. This would be a long-term investment rather than us looking to make money from it every month. I've been researching the likely monthly costs and questioning whether it actually stacks up financially.
We're in Scotland and would have to pay the additional dwelling supplement, which is 8% of the purchase price, as well as the usual stamp duty equivalent, insurances, letting agent fees etc.
Our other option would be to invest more in a stocks and shares ISA each month. Online calculators have suggested that if we invested £600 a month over 20 years we could come out with between £158,000 and £300,000, based on various growth rates.
If we bought a flat at £100k we'd have invested around £112k over 20 years, taking into account our initial deposit and the ongoing costs of being landlords. It seems unlikely the flat would rise in value enough to make a BTL a better option.
We have two young children and I'm wary about committing to an additional mortgage and all the stress of being a landlord. Is investing more the answer?
The other option would be to take the £600 and overpay our mortgage each month. The MSE calculator tells me that would shave 9 years off the mortgage, and we'd have it paid off by the time I was in my early 50s.
Lots of our friends have buy to let properties but earn more than we do. It's not so much money that a financial adviser would be interested in talking to us, and we don't have family we could ask for advice.
Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.