Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Money matters

Find financial and money-saving discussions including debt and pension chat on our Money forum. If you're looking for ways to make your money to go further, sign up to our Moneysaver emails here.

Government looking at inheritance tax

214 replies

HarryVanderspeigle · 12/08/2025 18:05

It says on the news today that the treasury are looking at reforms. Potentially looking at increasing the seven year rule, or a lifetime gift allowance. I don't really see how that would work as we all know that wealthier people will spend more on their children for things like weddings, university expenses, getting on the property ladder etc. But if it is to be reformed, how would you do it?

I often wonder if the objection is because 40% is so high. Would it actually raise more if it became 20% on estates over £100k? I can't see them putting the percentage up and we all know that very rich people find loopholes anyway.

OP posts:
jasflowers · 15/08/2025 19:34

nearlylovemyusername · 15/08/2025 16:55

On gain! not inheritance, gain!

40% on gain from Sfr 400k means approx £390k. There is no IHT though until they sell.

We pay 24-32% from everything above 3k.

Clam down!

Not on heritance, where did i mention inheritance? oh i didn't! i specifically talked about property and tax on sales, which the UK doesn't have on primary residence sales or even on inheritance, so i sold my primary residence, moved into the inherited property, which was below the £1m th.

jasflowers · 15/08/2025 19:39

nearlylovemyusername · 15/08/2025 14:54

Word of wisdom.

Who could've thought that IHT on non-doms will drive them away? now RR is considering to reverse it. Of course it won't be presented to public in Oct but buried somewhere is small font at the bottom of page 239 of the big and beautiful budget

According to Treasury leaks, Nom Doms haven't left or not in the numbers previously published.

Caveat that with we wont know until official figures published, however the initial report was from people with vested interests in getting more to relocate - so why believe them? their evidence was purely anecdotal and possibly self serving.

TheignT · 15/08/2025 19:43

messybutfun · 15/08/2025 14:07

Perfectly reasonable for someone who has tens of thousands spare every year.

That’s what Rachel from accounts thinks will happen when farms are passed down.

In most cases though, there is no other option but to sell the asset and pay off the IHT.

Yoube got an asset, you can live in it and no longer pay rent, you can let it and get rent or you can sell it. I'm not going to weep for people who have inherited millions because let's face it if they've just gone over the million they aren't going to be paying thousands for ten years. Even higher amounts tax free for farms and maybe farmers should pass on a share in the farm well before it is likely to be a problem.

mumda · 15/08/2025 19:56

Kendodd · 13/08/2025 21:05

If the thing you're opposed to is, as you put it, being 'taxed again'. Does that mean you are also opposed to VAT, council tax, stamp duty etc?

We should all be opposed to tax.

The government needs to be much better at spending other people's money.

TheignT · 15/08/2025 20:34

mumda · 15/08/2025 19:56

We should all be opposed to tax.

The government needs to be much better at spending other people's money.

How would we have the NHS, roads, schools, firemen etc etc without taxes?

nearlylovemyusername · 15/08/2025 21:11

jasflowers · 15/08/2025 19:39

According to Treasury leaks, Nom Doms haven't left or not in the numbers previously published.

Caveat that with we wont know until official figures published, however the initial report was from people with vested interests in getting more to relocate - so why believe them? their evidence was purely anecdotal and possibly self serving.

Yep, this headline was taken from payroll data collected from some selection companies, most of these non-doms haven't left (yet). The real ones with significant money aren't on those payrolls though. This was on FT a few days ago but i'm too lazy to find it now

EasternStandard · 16/08/2025 13:03

nearlylovemyusername · 15/08/2025 21:11

Yep, this headline was taken from payroll data collected from some selection companies, most of these non-doms haven't left (yet). The real ones with significant money aren't on those payrolls though. This was on FT a few days ago but i'm too lazy to find it now

Can you say more about the payroll data? Ie is it people on PAYE

childofthe607080s · 16/08/2025 15:58

Interesting guardian read today that despite a wealth tax introduced in Spain the super rich haven’t left in any great number , but they may be investing more ( in Spain ) to avoid some of the tax - sounds interesting

Witchlite · 16/08/2025 21:38

The only thing I find unreasonable about inheritance tax, is that you can’t offset buying and selling cost.

items sold at auction for a hammer price of £10000, with an auction charge of 8% plus vat, you receive £9040, but are taxed on £10,000

selling a house with 1.5%plus vat estate agent fees and legal costs. You are taxed on the 100% value of the house, but receive about 98% of that after fees.

After my parents died, I had to pay a lot of tax. I actually do agree with this! But it really annoyed me. Ditto, not being able to offset the costs (considerable) of clearing the house and prepping it for sale.

I think the estate should be taxed on the amount to be distributed plus the valuation of assets retained by beneficiaries.

DrPrunesqualer · 17/08/2025 00:15

Witchlite · 16/08/2025 21:38

The only thing I find unreasonable about inheritance tax, is that you can’t offset buying and selling cost.

items sold at auction for a hammer price of £10000, with an auction charge of 8% plus vat, you receive £9040, but are taxed on £10,000

selling a house with 1.5%plus vat estate agent fees and legal costs. You are taxed on the 100% value of the house, but receive about 98% of that after fees.

After my parents died, I had to pay a lot of tax. I actually do agree with this! But it really annoyed me. Ditto, not being able to offset the costs (considerable) of clearing the house and prepping it for sale.

I think the estate should be taxed on the amount to be distributed plus the valuation of assets retained by beneficiaries.

I agree
Costs to the executor are excluded so why not all costs to dispose of the estate

exasperatedflatmate · 17/08/2025 08:15

Good points about offset of costs. I wonder whether it would make more people likely to enter the process in good will?

Witchlite · 17/08/2025 09:48

exasperatedflatmate · 17/08/2025 08:15

Good points about offset of costs. I wonder whether it would make more people likely to enter the process in good will?

I truly believe that IHT is a “just” tax (I. Know some disagree) having recently paid a large amount. A lot of it’s done on an “honour system” eg reporting gifts and easily portable valuables, so things that just seem unfair are likely to reduce collection.

i did enter it with a good will and have left it with a slightly sour taste in my mouth. I still think it helps towards levelling society.

hairbearbunches · 21/08/2025 21:30

UtterlyButterly2048 · 15/08/2025 18:58

So many assumptions and so little fact. I am not dodging anything and I don’t “sneer” at anyone, the only person sneering is you.
And, the difference in your scenario is, it wasn’t money YOU had earned. You were being gifted it, glad to receive it. For those of us who have outright earned it and paid massive amounts of tax on it, and then want to gift it to our children, it sticks in the craw that it should be taxed, again. Surely, this is not difficult to understand?

What's not difficult to understand is that you're talking about the exact same scenario. You just can't see it. You're the parent and your kids, like @exasperatedflatmate are the ones being gifted. You won't have any tax to pay twice, you'll be dead. Your kids, enjoying their inheritance, might have some to pay. And bloody rightly so.

LoveLifeBeHappy · 22/04/2026 16:51

VimtoVimtoVimto · 12/08/2025 22:53

It shouldn't exist and I'm fully in favour if it being scrapped - damned if I'm paying a single extra penny to the government when I've already paid tax on it! I've just gone through the process of avoiding it with my DPs which thankfully is still legal but it's a right pain in the arse. I don't know why anyone would willingly pay it, all the government do is squander the money anyway.

It's a 300 year old bullshit.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread