Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Money matters

Find financial and money-saving discussions including debt and pension chat on our Money forum. If you're looking for ways to make your money to go further, sign up to our Moneysaver emails here.

Sofiewoo · 05/06/2025 16:12

While most benefits have been increased several times during the past few years I don’t think the income cut off for FSMs has risen so this makes sense.

ShesTheAlbatross · 05/06/2025 16:21

The current threshold (household income < £7,400) is too low I think.

I think they should fund it by taking away or reducing the universal free meals for reception-year 2 children. We get this for our DD, and we don’t need it. And it doesn’t make sense to me to give it universally until year 2, and then not. Just have a higher threshold across the board.

dollyblue01 · 05/06/2025 16:30

I think this is a great idea, anything that means no child will go without a meal a day at least I’m in favour of.

KIlliePieMyOhMy · 05/06/2025 16:32

Huzzah

Chewbecca · 05/06/2025 16:35

It's a good policy IMO, ensures the children are eating properly once a day at least, regardless if they may suffer from poor parental spending choices. I realise I sound a bit dictatorial saying that though!

Just need to ensure it doesn't add to disincentives to get off UC.

Ti7ch · 05/06/2025 16:44

ShesTheAlbatross · 05/06/2025 16:21

The current threshold (household income < £7,400) is too low I think.

I think they should fund it by taking away or reducing the universal free meals for reception-year 2 children. We get this for our DD, and we don’t need it. And it doesn’t make sense to me to give it universally until year 2, and then not. Just have a higher threshold across the board.

It was around £16k on tax credits. Makes no sense as to why it changed to such a low amount

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread