Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Money matters

Find financial and money-saving discussions including debt and pension chat on our Money forum. If you're looking for ways to make your money to go further, sign up to our Moneysaver emails here.

Universal credit and spending on luxuries

83 replies

Paulajane40 · 11/05/2025 18:10

Savings between 6-16k so have deductions , is it ok to use around 2k - 2.5k of savings to buy luxury items for big birthdays and big events eg eldest finishing GCSE.
Eg Tiffany , Gucci . All bills are paid and no other major outgoings for those months . I worry as some say your not allowed to spend on big purchases etc
doing so will still keep me above 12k so will have deductions still which I’m fine with

OP posts:
Theunamedcat · 11/05/2025 18:11

0 out of ten for being a goody government bot

Mercurial123 · 11/05/2025 18:14

Spend it all, and you'll end up with a load of overpriced tat.

hopeishere · 11/05/2025 18:14

Your money. Spend it on what you want.

LadyKenya · 11/05/2025 18:17

Why are you asking? Do what you want. You don't need permission, hth.

SingWithMeJustForToday · 11/05/2025 18:19

If you're reviewed for some reason and it's noticed; it'll be assessed by someone who decides if it was a reasonable cost. If it's determined not to be, it'll be considered deprivation of assets, and you'll be treated as if you still had that money.

Nobody here can say if it would be considered deprivation of assets, but I'd expect it probably would, if you're reviewed. Prepare accordingly.

Overtheatlantic · 11/05/2025 18:20

Yeah, not Tiffany.

Viviennemary · 11/05/2025 18:23

You could send the surplus money to a food bank. After all people relying on them could be in the same boat as you. Having spent all their money on Mulberry handbags.

Missgemini · 11/05/2025 18:24

Have you bought a flat screen TV yet?

WednesdaysChild25 · 11/05/2025 18:25

Seriously

Hubblebubble · 11/05/2025 18:27

This is why I choose not to be on UC. I've got 12K in savings and like the freedom of being able to add to/spend as i please without the fear of interference and fines from the government. My freedom is worth so much more than the measly top up I'd recieve for being poorly paid.

TheLimeQuail · 11/05/2025 18:28

I don’t think you’re allowed to spend a lot of money on something that’s unreasonable spending. But you could buy a washing machine, a car, that sort of thing.

nahthatsnotforme · 11/05/2025 18:29

And there was I thinking benefits were for those who need help.

Hubblebubble · 11/05/2025 18:29

But if you're looking for ways to spend money that won't be seen as deprivation of capital, have you considered sending your children to lessons for a particular sport (maybe one with lots of kit?) and an instrument? That will add up and money spent on education is never wasted

Mrsttcno1 · 11/05/2025 18:31

If you spend savings in a way that is deemed unreasonable then you could be accused of deprivation of assets. Not sure how you could justify 2.5k on designer bags as anything other than unreasonable when you expect government help to pay your bills?

Hubblebubble · 11/05/2025 18:31

@nahthatsnotforme benefits are also there to top up stagnant low wages during a COL crisis. Id redirect some anger at the greedy employers.

nahthatsnotforme · 11/05/2025 18:33

Hubblebubble · 11/05/2025 18:31

@nahthatsnotforme benefits are also there to top up stagnant low wages during a COL crisis. Id redirect some anger at the greedy employers.

Low enough to have spare cash for extravagant luxuries? Don’t make me laugh

Hubblebubble · 11/05/2025 18:34

@nahthatsnotforme it is possible to have savings and be on a low income. How many of us choose roles post children that pay less but fit around school hours?

spicemaiden · 11/05/2025 18:35

You spend it as you wish.

Hubblebubble · 11/05/2025 18:36

And how many employers pay less than they should because they expect UC top ups to make up the shortfall?

nahthatsnotforme · 11/05/2025 18:36

Hubblebubble · 11/05/2025 18:34

@nahthatsnotforme it is possible to have savings and be on a low income. How many of us choose roles post children that pay less but fit around school hours?

You will never convince me that benefits are needed by someone who is considering purchases from Tiffany or Gucci.

Bromptotoo · 11/05/2025 18:36

SingWithMeJustForToday · 11/05/2025 18:19

If you're reviewed for some reason and it's noticed; it'll be assessed by someone who decides if it was a reasonable cost. If it's determined not to be, it'll be considered deprivation of assets, and you'll be treated as if you still had that money.

Nobody here can say if it would be considered deprivation of assets, but I'd expect it probably would, if you're reviewed. Prepare accordingly.

You don't understand what deprivation means.

It's not about what you spend it's about intent.

Upsetbetty · 11/05/2025 18:36

Overtheatlantic · 11/05/2025 18:20

Yeah, not Tiffany.

Tiffany is definitely not what it used to be…so tacky

spicemaiden · 11/05/2025 18:37

nahthatsnotforme · 11/05/2025 18:33

Low enough to have spare cash for extravagant luxuries? Don’t make me laugh

surely it’s possible gif someone to have had to change jobs/reduce hours/other life circumstances that would warrant UC claim abc still have savings? You are aware that UV allows saving of up to 6k with no penalties and then a £4.35 deduction from claim for every £250 iver £6k up to £16k yes?

nahthatsnotforme · 11/05/2025 18:39

Savings for day to day needs, home repairs, white good, a simple holiday even. But for Tiffany or Gucci. Nope

Minnie798 · 11/05/2025 18:40

All fur coat and no knickers springs to mind.

Swipe left for the next trending thread