Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Money matters

Find financial and money-saving discussions including debt and pension chat on our Money forum. If you're looking for ways to make your money to go further, sign up to our Moneysaver emails here.

Inheritance tax - a morbid tax but one which impacts a loft of middle class families

276 replies

mids2019 · 27/08/2024 19:29

Inheritance tax may be on the increase in the next budget but having just been through probate it for me thinking that iht really impacts a lot of lifetime savers and those with property.

Parents have already paid tax on the income they have saved so there is a moral question over the governments ability to.tax the money again. Is this really fair and isn't it a right we should have the ability to pass on our property to our children?

Also surely it is the middle classes that suffer as I guess anyone with serious wealth protects their assets through complex tax avoidance schemes e.g. footballers, celebs, bankers etc.

OP posts:
nearlylovemyusername · 27/08/2024 21:09

MattSmithsBowTie · 27/08/2024 19:49

But if you don’t save it and you spend it during your lifetime you’d pay tax on the things you buy with it, the government need to get their cut one way or the other and it’s better to have that money moving rather than stacked up in the bank accounts or property portfolios of a small number of families.

No, it's wrong conclusion. In current climate it's best to estimate how much you need in your lifetime and stop working as soon as you have close to it. Then spend everything - you'll be bailed out by the state anyway.
Have you heard about FIRE movement? it's hugely detrimental for economy and future generations but great for those practicing it. I expect a lot more people to join it

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 27/08/2024 21:09

Kendodd · 27/08/2024 20:29

What seems bizarre to me is that if you worked, really hard, for years, you would have paid tax every month on your earnings. If you inherit a million quid, that you did not one single bit of work for or anything in any way to deserve, not a penny in tax will you owe on all that free money.
Why are people so happy to load the tax burden onto people who work very hard and have to spread money thinly to make ends meet so that others can have £££ of free money, no tax.
Bonkers!

People who want to leave an inheritance are not loading their tax burden on others, they have paid their share. They are the ones who carry the tax burden.

You say it’s not right because their children have not paid tax on it, but then neither have those who you think should bereft from it.

Grumpy12345 · 27/08/2024 21:16

allthemiddlechildrenoftheworld · 27/08/2024 20:18

@mids2019 sorry but I genuinely think that labour are becoming a very socialist party! disgusted at the fact that they are also now anti pensioner party even though, for years, their core voters are the pensioners of today!! why should IHT be increased for people who have worked hard all their lives to buy their assets to leave to their offspring? neither my hubby nor I had an inheritance, we didnt go to uni and we didnt receive unemployment benefit, cost the govt nothing!! but took a bloody fortune in tax! tax when you ear, tax while living and taxed when you die!!

What are you talking about? No-one gets taxed when they die. They’re dead…they can’t pay tax 😆 Whoever inherits from them will pay the tax.

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 27/08/2024 21:17

On the point of whether it's fair or not, It seems quite straightforward to me. My husband and I own a house in London which we bought nearly 30 years ago. It's worth a lot more than we paid for it. In due course our children will inherit it. They've done nothing whatsoever to earn that money and neither have we, other than not defaulting on our original mortgage, and not letting the house fall into rack and ruin. Why shouldn't some tax be paid on our unearned capital gain? Even after paying a bit of tax, our children are going to be in a very fortunate position financially compared with many others their age.

Kendodd · 27/08/2024 21:18

For what it's worth, I will never understand why large lottery wins aren't taxed either.

WanderlyWagonInWales · 27/08/2024 21:19

“A lot of middle class families” …. It’s generously estimated that around 7% of all estates will be subject to inheritance tax. Your version of “a lot” differs greatly to mine OP!!

newmummycwharf1 · 27/08/2024 21:23

nearlylovemyusername · 27/08/2024 21:09

No, it's wrong conclusion. In current climate it's best to estimate how much you need in your lifetime and stop working as soon as you have close to it. Then spend everything - you'll be bailed out by the state anyway.
Have you heard about FIRE movement? it's hugely detrimental for economy and future generations but great for those practicing it. I expect a lot more people to join it

How is FIRE detrimental to future generations?

lechatnoir · 27/08/2024 21:25

The money's got to come from somewhere so if it's not income tax increases, then why not IHT? You are paying a tax on income that you have NOT already paid tax on - the deceased may well have done on some of it, but you haven't and will be rewarded very handsomely if you are paying IHT.

I don't have a problem with an increase but my parents are fuming (even though I'll be the one paying it!) They will likely leave a £2m+ estate (£1.5m house plus lots of other bonds, trusts and physical assets). Honestly, I wish they bloody spend some of it on themselves or share it with the family and enjoy it with us. It's quite odd IMO - they are generous in that they'll pay for dinner out if we go together for example, but given their level of wealth they really could treat us and their grandkids a bit more. I have literally no idea how we will afford the IHT bill if some doesn't go on care fees or they start spending it soon.

Which raises a question: before assets are liquidised/property sold, would we have to remortgage to pay the tax bill or am I missing something? We aren't big earners and simply don't have lots of cash spare (but yes, aware we will ultimately be well off)

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 27/08/2024 21:29

I put a link above. HMRC have a procedure where you can apply to postpone paying the tax until you have probate and can start turning the assets into cash. You probably pay interest.

LondonLass61 · 27/08/2024 21:30

Summertimer · 27/08/2024 19:34

If the estate isn’t over a million, you will be ok

If you're single or divorced - the limit is £500,000 - as long as it's left to DC or charity, if not, the limit is £325,000.
How much do the Royal Family and other members of the 'aristocracy' pay?

lechatnoir · 27/08/2024 21:34

@Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g cheers for that will take a look.

Summertimer · 27/08/2024 21:39

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 27/08/2024 21:29

I put a link above. HMRC have a procedure where you can apply to postpone paying the tax until you have probate and can start turning the assets into cash. You probably pay interest.

As in house sold rather than probate

missjeanbrodie123 · 27/08/2024 21:41

ThreeFeetTall · 27/08/2024 19:31

But the parents aren't paying tax again.

Well strictly speaking the parents' estate is paying the tax

Oldfatandfrumpy · 27/08/2024 21:44

Personally I think inheritance tax should be increased. Yes parents have paid tax on their earnings, but most likely not on any increase in property values and the beneficiaries haven't paid any tax on it at all until they meet the IHT threshold

And no there isn't 'a right' to pass anything on, if there were then properties wouldn't be sold to pay for care fees.

I find the whole 'I deserve a good inheritance' thing really quite gross.

Cookerhood · 27/08/2024 21:46

My father's estate paid some tax - had my mother died a few months later we wouldn't have done (didn't get the full residency amount for the property for her part). Their house was bought for £4000 in the 1960s & sold for £700K. Very little of that was from taxed income. I didn't begrudge paying a bit of tax on it (or rather, the estate paying tax).

Teddleshon · 27/08/2024 21:49

I think 40% is just too high. Almost no other country has a rate as high as this that kicks in at this sort of level.

I would have no problem whatsoever with a 25% rate but as a couple who have spent 30+ years climbing the proper ladder by buying wrecks and spending most of our spare time improving them while never buying a new car or jewellery or having expensive holidays and so on, 40% sticks in the throat.

If we had rented all these years or not bothered with all the improvements the government's tax take would be an awful lot lower.

Soontobe60 · 27/08/2024 21:51

ShanghaiDiva · 27/08/2024 19:38

The nightmare of dealing with HMRC and HMCTS to start with.

To be fair, it’s a nightmare dealing with the death of a parent in any circumstances. There are many children whose parent has died penniless and they can’t even afford a decent funeral.

Soontobe60 · 27/08/2024 21:52

Grumpy12345 · 27/08/2024 21:16

What are you talking about? No-one gets taxed when they die. They’re dead…they can’t pay tax 😆 Whoever inherits from them will pay the tax.

No, IHT comes from the deceased persons estate. Their beneficiaries don’t pay a penny.

missjeanbrodie123 · 27/08/2024 21:54

lechatnoir · 27/08/2024 21:25

The money's got to come from somewhere so if it's not income tax increases, then why not IHT? You are paying a tax on income that you have NOT already paid tax on - the deceased may well have done on some of it, but you haven't and will be rewarded very handsomely if you are paying IHT.

I don't have a problem with an increase but my parents are fuming (even though I'll be the one paying it!) They will likely leave a £2m+ estate (£1.5m house plus lots of other bonds, trusts and physical assets). Honestly, I wish they bloody spend some of it on themselves or share it with the family and enjoy it with us. It's quite odd IMO - they are generous in that they'll pay for dinner out if we go together for example, but given their level of wealth they really could treat us and their grandkids a bit more. I have literally no idea how we will afford the IHT bill if some doesn't go on care fees or they start spending it soon.

Which raises a question: before assets are liquidised/property sold, would we have to remortgage to pay the tax bill or am I missing something? We aren't big earners and simply don't have lots of cash spare (but yes, aware we will ultimately be well off)

You can pay IHT which relates to the house in 10 annual instalments

Fluufer · 27/08/2024 21:56

Teddleshon · 27/08/2024 21:49

I think 40% is just too high. Almost no other country has a rate as high as this that kicks in at this sort of level.

I would have no problem whatsoever with a 25% rate but as a couple who have spent 30+ years climbing the proper ladder by buying wrecks and spending most of our spare time improving them while never buying a new car or jewellery or having expensive holidays and so on, 40% sticks in the throat.

If we had rented all these years or not bothered with all the improvements the government's tax take would be an awful lot lower.

Presumably you didn't buy just so your kids can inherit? You bought so that you can live in a lovely house and enjoy a mortgage free retirement. If your main concern is truly passing money down, you can downsize and do so now.

Lovelydovey · 27/08/2024 21:56

I'd make inheritance tax higher and have fewer loopholes (eg trusts). I think it would be a great leveller.

User6874356 · 27/08/2024 21:58

halava · 27/08/2024 19:43

Yes that can be traumatic at a very sad and difficult time.

My brother was the executor in our case and he handed everything over to a solicitor. Worked well he said, and of course solicitor charged his fee, but brother said it was worth every penny to get the worst of the "work" done by someone else. It wasn't a huge estate either but above the threshold.

I do understand that this might not be financially worth it in some cases.

If an estate is above the threshold, it’s certainly cost effective to have a good solicitor deal with it. They have to experience of dealing with HMRC.

LizzieSiddal · 27/08/2024 21:59

YABVU.
Where else do you suggest the tax comes from?
Hopefully this government will make it harder for the very wealthy to lock away money and they will pay their fair share too.

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 27/08/2024 22:02

Teddleshon · 27/08/2024 21:49

I think 40% is just too high. Almost no other country has a rate as high as this that kicks in at this sort of level.

I would have no problem whatsoever with a 25% rate but as a couple who have spent 30+ years climbing the proper ladder by buying wrecks and spending most of our spare time improving them while never buying a new car or jewellery or having expensive holidays and so on, 40% sticks in the throat.

If we had rented all these years or not bothered with all the improvements the government's tax take would be an awful lot lower.

You do understand that it's not 40% of your total estate? It's 40% of whatever is above the threshold. For most people that's 0.