MLMs and their mouthpieces shy away from the word “typical” which is a shame because if they were forced to only cite typical examples of earnings there would be a lot less damage done. The bots now think that if they cite what’s possible rather than what’s probable then they are not technically lying. Mentioning any amount “a month” implies a regular/constant/consistent earning capacity and that is very enticing right now, but it’s a lie, especially when Bots like Yawn can’t achieve this on a consistent basis either.
Yawn is really getting out of hand. Where is FLP in all this? Next month is the MLM conference where Truth in Ad will be discussing their income claim findings. As a result of their findings specifically about FLP they wrote to Compliance at FLP who then made all the right noises and distanced themselves from their bots’ claims (Yawn featured on their list of examples), yet it continues. In fact the lies are stepping up as FLP puts more pressure on the likes of Yawn.
The result is people getting hooked into a scam, hanging in there in the hope that this month it will all come together while their families pay the price of having a loved one trapped in a cash leeching cult.