My dh was made redundant in January. A lawyer friend of ours was sure he had a case for unfair dismissal and he was following this up when he found another job. Apparently you can't pursue a case once you have another job because you haven't lost out, this doesn't seem very fair to me but what do I know?! Anyway, my dh was on 3 months notice and having gone through the stress of suddenly being made redundant out of the blue and trying to find another job he asked his new company if he could have 4 weeks off before starting because although he'd had a month off it wasn't very relaxing. They said fine. ANYWAY, he is due to start at the beginning of April 4 weeks before his 3 months notice is up. He has already rung the old company and asked if they would release him from his contract early and my question is this. Why should he have to have done this? He worked bloody hard for them for over 4 years and was thrown out one morning with statutory redundancy. Am I just being all bitter and twisted towards his old company?(very probably) Are you not allowed to be on the pay roll of two companies at once? I just don't see why his old company should be let off paying him one months salary just because he is blimming good at what he does and secured another job so quickly after being canned.
Hope I've made sense. I just feel really pissed off at how some big companies can get away with dispensing of people so easily.