I am probably being really stupid, but have always had a crap pension so have buried my head in the sand about it for as long as I can.
I am currently in a small company, top of my pay band and nowhere to move in the company (only 2 roles senior to mine, and neither I would want/ be able to do). Pay is £39k with 3% employer pension contribution. I feel the pay is fair for my job, but obviously the pension is bad. In addition, I have been there a long time and feel ready for a change.
I have an interview for a job with the civil service on £33k, with 29% employer contribution. So I think the overall package is slightly better with the civil service role, by about 2k, but I am not sure if it as simple as just adding salary and pension together. Hopefully the new role would also offer more room for progression. However, I think my take home pay would be about £400pm less, and that might feel hard, especially as one child will be going off to uni soon on a minimum loan. So there is a temptation to stick with the higher salary, but I want to do the right thing for both long term and short term me. I think that is lower salary, better pension, more room for progression, right? I have tried for more senior jobs in the civil service but not got anywhere.
I am 42 and currently have only about £18k in my pension. Still paying off my own student loan too! 😔