This is such a random post. Please bear with me. I’ve been dating a man with a child and we’ve been talking about getting married. He doesn’t have custody of the child (18mths) and has had an informal arrangement with his ex that he sees his child one day every 2 weeks. He’d really like to see her more, and his ex says she’d be open to weekly visits if he pays more in child support.
He makes around 21k, and his required legal child support, based on his income, is around the £150 mark per month. I personally don’t think this is enough to raise a child on and neither does he, so he pays £400-700 every month (eg in the last year, he has paid just over £6000 in maintenance - I’ve seen the statements).
I know I’m not a parent, please tell me if I’m being stupid or overcrossing boundaries here by expressing this on this forum.
Is it a bit unfair for her to ask for more child support in exchange for him seeing his child more often or is this common practice? It isn’t to cover travel as he travels up to see them. Is it something he could contest if they made this more formal and he took her to court? He mentioned reducing his child maintenance to the minimum until they can sort out visitation but I said I think this is really unfair and I personally wouldn’t be comfortable staying in a relationship with someone who is indirectly punishing his child (by providing less financial support) due to being in conflict with their mother, and we had a bit of a tiff over this.
I’m just not sure where to stand on the matter and if he is in the wrong? Are there any mums on here who act as the primary single parent for a child? Is he wrong? Am I?
Their child is 2. They live around 2 hours away from each other.