Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Money matters

Find financial and money-saving discussions including debt and pension chat on our Money forum. If you're looking for ways to make your money to go further, sign up to our Moneysaver emails here.

Named driver on insurance

14 replies

Aparecium · 12/02/2024 12:00

Ds is the named main driver on his car insurance. He put me as a named driver because it reduced his premium. Does this mean I should actually drive his car from time to time?

OP posts:
TheFlis · 12/02/2024 12:02

How would anyone know if you did or not?

TooBusyGazingAtStarss · 12/02/2024 12:03

This reply has been withdrawn

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

Cookerhood · 12/02/2024 12:05

This reply has been deleted

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

No it isn't. Fronting would be if the parent was named as the main driver but actually the son was.

LadyDanburysHat · 12/02/2024 12:05

This reply has been deleted

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

No it would be fronting if the OP was named as main driver and not just an additional one. I am a named driver on my DSes insurance. It means I could legally move his car off the drive etc. if I needed to. I don't drive his car regularly.

whowhatwerewhy · 12/02/2024 12:05

I'm a named driver on 3 cars , never driven any of them .

flipent · 12/02/2024 12:06

That is not fronting.

My mum has been a named driver on my car for 20 years. It means she would be fully insured to drive my car, but rarely does.

Fronting would be if you were named as the main driver, but your son was the only one driving it.

trooc · 12/02/2024 12:07

This reply has been deleted

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

No it's not. Fronting is where you put someone else as the main driver to get a cheaper price.

OP you are fine I was in DH insurance for year and only drive his car once in an emergency as I had my own car. So long as the main driver is your DS you are doing nothing wrong. Most people have named drivers on their policy who rarely use the car.

Hoplolly · 12/02/2024 12:07

This reply has been deleted

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

No it's not. Fronting would be if OP was a named driver but was actually the MAIN driver.

TooBusyGazingAtStarss · 12/02/2024 12:11

Read it wrong sorry everyone!
If you're a named driver then you're insured to drive it, doesn't mean you have to.

Muchtoomuchtodo · 12/02/2024 12:13

No, you don’t have to drive it at all.

Double check though, when ds took his insurance out last autumn it was cheaper I have DH and me on the policy. He looked last week and it’s now cheaper for us not to be on there - he had over £200 back!

Aparecium · 12/02/2024 12:14

🤣 the clue is in the first sentence.

Thanks. It suddenly occurred to me that this might be a sort of reverse fronting.

OP posts:
mum11970 · 12/02/2024 12:16

Absolutely no reason you need to drive your DS’s car at all, it can be just there in case you need to drive it in an emergency. I’m on multiple policies but only the main driver on my own

Bromptotoo · 12/02/2024 12:36

You're fine. I was on my Mum's insurance for years but only drove her car a handful of times on odd errands etc.

ohtowinthelottery · 12/02/2024 12:36

We've got 3 cars between 3 adults. DS is insured as a named driver on mine and is the main driver on his. DH and I are both named drivers on DS's car and I'm a named driver on DH's. I very rarely drive anything other than my car but maybe once a year when cars are in for a service we swap cars so people can get to work.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page