I worked in local government (Scotland) for a while but left 20+ years ago. I am now planning to start drawing down the pension from the contributions I paid in to the LGPS (final salary scheme). I am planning doing this a few months before my 60th birthday next year as I want to cut down my working hours as soon as possible, and have had an estimate which shows that the cost of taking it early is tiny. It also seems that isn't any real advantage in deferring drawing it down.
I am planning to continue to work part-time (I work freelance) for a good few years past my 60th birthday. I will still be paying contributions in to a NEST pension and I have already accrued enough years for full state pension when I reach 67. DH also has various pensions, the first one, an LGPS one like mine, falling due in a few months when he reaches 60, and others which will kick in later on.
When I received my estimate figures for lump sum and monthly payments, I was surprised to find that I could elect to draw down a further 25% lump sum tax-free, meaning that I could take £54k rather than £30k. This would mean a lower monthly pension amount but I have calculated that I would really only start losing out financially after 12 years (1212monthly reduction = £24k), when we will have other pension income coming in (assuming that we are both still around!).
I also reckon that taking the lower monthly amount and higher lump sum will save me some income tax while I am still working as the monthly pension will be calculated as part of my taxable income once I reach the annual income tax threshold. I could reinvest the extra £24k (as I will do with the £30k) to produce additional income each year, although I don't think any investment income will cover the monthly income reduction.
Am I missing something or does it make sense to take the higher lump sum now with the lower monthly amount?
I will get some independent financial advice but just wondered if anyone else has any experience with this.