Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Money matters

Find financial and money-saving discussions including debt and pension chat on our Money forum. If you're looking for ways to make your money to go further, sign up to our Moneysaver emails here.

FTB: stay in social housing and rent out a small property?

121 replies

CorStrewth · 23/04/2023 12:12

I know this may be contentious but I believe completely legal.l and appreciate I'd have to check Ts and Cs of my rental.

Currently have a great social house, I've been a social tenant for 17 years and through being a good tenant was able to get a better and bigger house when I needed it 8 years ago.

Now DH and I have built our careers and looking to be FTB. We would go from £500 in rent to 1k-1.5k per month. I'm toying with the idea of buying a small property I.e. 1 bed flat and renting out, not necessarily for profit but to have that asset and essentially not costing me anything, kind of like a business venture, staying in our SH until we have a good deposit for a house to live in.

Are there any reasons financially why that may not be a good option? I have two children settled in school etx so downsizing and living somewhere smaller for a little while isn't as feasible as it would have been if we'd bought before having kids.

Thanks again, great advice yesterday re: FTB in current times

OP posts:
windmill26 · 23/04/2023 18:42

Seventhirtyanditsearly · 23/04/2023 12:35

Once you have a secure tenancy (they Tony often give these types of tenancies now but there are still many people who have them) you can literally win the lottery and not be expected to move - there is no means testing they were just given as secure lifetime tenancies and most had succession rights so can in theory regardless of financial circumstances remain in the same family for a long time

It does happen,the system is f....d!
We live in a big development with a mix of privately owned, shared ownership and a handful of social housing properties. Some of the social housing tenants have very expensive cars (a Porsche for example) or 2 to 3 cars per family (Audi,Range Rover etc). This can be achieved because the rent charged is a pittance compared to open market rents or mortgages. I can assure you that we earn above the average and we certainly don't drive a Porsche!

windmill26 · 23/04/2023 18:44

Hell121 · 23/04/2023 15:19

And totally agree @BeetrootBeetrootGhali which is why we are leaving this country

Same here!

SchoolTripDrama · 23/04/2023 18:58

Seventhirtyanditsearly · 23/04/2023 12:23

I think this is allowed as long as your council property is your main residence and has always been. Might be worth checking your tenancy agreement though a well.

It would I think affect any benefits if you get UC

It absolutely is NOT allowed! They do means testing now for social housing and any assets over £6,000 are taken into account. You have to meet criteria

SchoolTripDrama · 23/04/2023 19:00

tubing · 23/04/2023 12:35

Wow is this actually legal?!

yep, i know someone who has done it.

It is not legal at all, it's fraud! I'm in social housing and they do checks for assets on each tenant every 5 years now without informing the tenants. My next door neighbour lost her tenancy because it was discovered that she had bought a plot of land with an old barn on it, worth £25k!

SchoolTripDrama · 23/04/2023 19:02

ohsuzannah · 23/04/2023 17:18

What's wrong with just staying where you are and saving? Going by your OP you could save £500 a month!

You cannot have savings of more than £6,000 if you're in social housing

NewNovember · 23/04/2023 19:03

SchoolTripDrama · 23/04/2023 19:02

You cannot have savings of more than £6,000 if you're in social housing

That's nonsense you can have a million pounds and live in social housing.

Easterfunbun · 23/04/2023 19:04

@SchoolTripDrama

This isn’t true for my HA. I have thousands saved for a cash purchase. Then my house will be returned to my housing association.

Easterfunbun · 23/04/2023 19:04

I am a self payer though and don’t get housing benefit.

SchoolTripDrama · 23/04/2023 19:05

@Seventhirtyanditsearly This is total nonsense and incorrect. I was thoroughly means tested at the beginning of my social housing tenancy in 2019 and will be again next year and every subsequent 5 years going forward. Please get your facts right.

SchoolTripDrama · 23/04/2023 19:05

Easterfunbun · 23/04/2023 19:04

@SchoolTripDrama

This isn’t true for my HA. I have thousands saved for a cash purchase. Then my house will be returned to my housing association.

Then you are committing fraud!! Check with your housing officer, this is very much illegal

Easterfunbun · 23/04/2023 19:07

@SchoolTripDrama

no it isn’t. I don’t claim benefits and I pay full rent. I also don’t have a 5 year term I have a secure tenancy. There’s no fraud involved whatsoever and my house will be being returned in the next year or so.

NewNovember · 23/04/2023 19:07

SchoolTripDrama · 23/04/2023 19:05

Then you are committing fraud!! Check with your housing officer, this is very much illegal

Again nonsense

Nimbostratus100 · 23/04/2023 19:08

it will cost you far more than you make, once you take into account the whole cost of buying, cost of insuring, capital gains tax, and everything else.

Easterfunbun · 23/04/2023 19:08

@SchoolTripDrama

You are not allowed to have more than 6k in savings if you are in receipt of housing benefit which I am not. I pay full rent.

drpet49 · 23/04/2023 19:09

GiveInToTemptation · 23/04/2023 12:21

This is why social housing needs to be means tested and people should move on once they earn above the threshold.

Completely agree.

Easterfunbun · 23/04/2023 19:10

@drpet49

If that was the case though I can assure you I wouldn’t have saved so much money and would have sat pretty in my social house forever. By actually allowing people like myself to move forward they actually get their stock back a lot quicker.

Snugglemonkey · 23/04/2023 19:11

What the actual fuck?

Why would you consider this to be remotely appropriate?

Get out of social housing and free it up for a family in a bedsit.

user1477255159 · 23/04/2023 19:11

Babyroobs · 23/04/2023 15:10

We do if this is allowed. Most people are genuinely honest people though and wouldn't even consider this.

Most people aren't honest.
Most people stay as honest as consequences allow.

OP I'm all for ambition and Initiative but also for integrity, honesty and equity. I can't type what I think about you but take a moment and think about those of us subsidising your housing and those you're depriving of accommodation.
You make higher rate tax payers resentful and will be the bane of this country.

greyhairnomore · 23/04/2023 19:13

Fucking hell I hope you're joking ???

DyslexicPoster · 23/04/2023 19:13

Seventhirtyanditsearly · 23/04/2023 12:23

I think this is allowed as long as your council property is your main residence and has always been. Might be worth checking your tenancy agreement though a well.

It would I think affect any benefits if you get UC

As far as I aware UC stops if you have a btl

shattered25 · 23/04/2023 19:19

purpleme12 · 23/04/2023 12:18

Wow is this actually legal?!

It is, I know people who end up buying their council property, there is an option to buy it from council at a low deposit I think as well as rent at same price still when back in work. So all legal. I was homeless a while back but never managed to get a council property, I was in a b&b for a long time went the private rent route, back on my feet now finally! But it was a hard slog, so worked out in the end. But I do think it's short sighted of councils, as although it's great for people to get on property ladder, they never buy replacement properties for the ones they lose. It's all really sad, there were so many families in emergency accommodation in my building, a few women who had fled violence with their children, my particular building had very inadequate heating, I found the women and her child in her car outside using the heater to warm up 😪

eatdrinkandbemerry · 23/04/2023 19:22

It might be legal but it's certainly immoral 🤷‍♀️

Riapia · 23/04/2023 19:37

OriginalUsername2 · 23/04/2023 12:16

You are aware of the families stuck in B&Bs?

The OP could let families stuck in B&B’s live in her rental property.
She gets her mortgage paid, people get out of B&B and she can stay amongst her own community.
Every one a winner.

SchoolTripDrama · 23/04/2023 19:56

Easterfunbun · 23/04/2023 19:07

@SchoolTripDrama

no it isn’t. I don’t claim benefits and I pay full rent. I also don’t have a 5 year term I have a secure tenancy. There’s no fraud involved whatsoever and my house will be being returned in the next year or so.

I too have a secure lifelong tenancy but they still do means testing every 5 years. You can say it's nonsense all you like but it's fact!

SchoolTripDrama · 23/04/2023 19:57

@NewNovember
Nope it is not nonsense it's fact! Do your research!