Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Money matters

Find financial and money-saving discussions including debt and pension chat on our Money forum. If you're looking for ways to make your money to go further, sign up to our Moneysaver emails here.

Choosing a CTF - ethical or high-performing?

3 replies

phdlife · 08/10/2007 11:55

In a twist on the "public or private schools" debate - I have a strong greenie streak; Family Investments CTF is performing reasonably well; I'm tempted to go with them.

OTOH, DH and I are not in a good financial position for ourselves, let alone ds, and I am anxious to leave him better set up than we were. (We are both around 40, have never owned property, and for long, boring reasons, extremely little in the way of pension, etc).

It is extremely doubtful whether we'll be able to put much of our own towards the CTF and if we do it'll be hit hard by exchange rates. So an unethical, high-performing fund is tempting indeed...

WWYD?

OP posts:
MadamePlatypus · 09/10/2007 11:23

My theory is that the green funds will do better in the long run because they are into sustainable business, which I reckon must be good financially as well as ethically. Family Investments offer both an ethical and a normal fund.

ninedragons · 10/10/2007 10:38

I agree with MadamePlatypus. I work in banking and my personal view is that over the next 10-20 years, green stocks will be the new dotcom boom.

Many of what you (rightly) regard as "unethical" businesses are also vulnerable to staggeringly big lawsuits and changes in legislation. For example, if the EU were to pass a law banning crude palm oil or taxing it at a punitive rate, the Malaysian and Indonesian plantation companies would all be screwed overnight.

The other thing to consider is not what China exports (dictated by Western demands, i.e. 40 zillion plastic Power Rangers a year) but what it imports itself. They know that social stability is only possible in a healthy environment, so to hang onto power the government is madly looking at things like renewable energy. Personally I'd rather have my child's money in geothermal energy or companies that make photovoltaic cells than in ones that are based on consumption of tat.

ninedragons · 10/10/2007 10:56

I forgot to say, high performance correlates with high risk. Just because the high-performance funds have done well over the past two or three years, it doesn't mean that performance is at all sustainable in the future so if you're looking for a 20-year investment horizon, I'd go for ethical. Everything could all go pear-shaped very easily after another Sept 11 or if people actually wake up and realise that a moron has been in charge of the world's biggest economy for the past eight years. Again it's nothing but my personal view, but I can see a lot of economic chickens coming home to roost after the 2008 US elections.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread